A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Assessing the oncologic risk when systematic and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy grade groups are discordant




TekijätScuderi, Simone; Targeted Biopsies Prostate Cancer Collaborative Group; Tin, Amy L.; Marra, Giancarlo; Bianchi, Lorenzo; Kesch, Claudia; Soeterik, Timo F. W.; Ploussard, Guillaume; Zattoni, Fabio; Ettala, Otto; Røder, Andreas; Poyet, Cédric; Stroomberg, Hein Vincent; Cimmino, Umberto; Fiard, Gaelle; Nordström, Tobias; Patel, Hiten D.; Gupta, Gopal N.; Yonover, Paul M.; Guillaume, Benedicte; Gaffney, Cristopher; Zhuang, Junlong; Wang, YanQin; Sarkis, Julien; Jabbour, Teddy; Diamand, Romain; Windisch, Olivier; Olivier, Jonathan; Abbadi, Ahmad; Kim, Eric H.; Wang, Johnny C.; Hu, Jim; Zhu, Alec; Stabile, Armando; Eastham, James A.; Montorsi, Francesco; Briganti, Alberto; Gandaglia, Giorgio; European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists YAU Prostate Cancer Working Party; Vickers, Andrew J.

KustantajaOxford University Press (OUP)

Julkaisuvuosi2025

Lehti: JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Artikkelin numerodjaf275

ISSN0027-8874

eISSN1460-2105

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf275

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläEi avoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Osittain avoin julkaisukanava

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf275


Tiivistelmä

Background and Objective

In the systematic biopsy (SBx) era, prostate biopsy grading followed the rule that the ISUP grade group (GG) assigned was the highest GG of any core. This rule has been retained in the era of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy in the case of discordance between SBx and targeted (TBx) samples. We assessed whether oncologic risk in patients undergoing SBx and TBx was driven by the highest GG of the two.

Methods

Overall, 6,588 patients received SBx plus MRI-TBx and radical prostatectomy. We assessed advanced stage (seminal vesicle (SVI) or lymph node invasion (LNI) ± extraprostatic extension (EPE)), adverse pathology (advanced stage or high GG), and biochemical recurrence (BCR) for each SBx and MRI-TBx GG combination.

Key Findings and Limitations

Overall, 3,405 (52%) had discordant GGs. When SBx and MRI-TBx grades were discordant, the risk of advanced-stage disease was intermediate. For instance, the risk of advanced pathologic stage was 23% for GG3 on both SBx and TBx, and 8.8% for concordant GG2. The risk was 18% for patients with SBx GG3 but TBx GG2, and 15% if the reverse were true. Similar results were seen for other outcomes.

Conclusions and Clinical Implications

When the GG is discordant between SBx and TBx, the risk is intermediate. The current approach of assigning the highest GG should be abandoned, and urologists should consider de-escalating treatment intensity for patients with discordant SBx and MRI-TBx GGs. Our findings are plausibly explained by pattern 4 volume being the primary driver of risk.


Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (NIH/NCI) with a Cancer Center Support Grant to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center [P30 CA008748], a SPORE grant in Prostate Cancer to Dr. H. Scher [P50-CA92629], the Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers and David H. Koch through the Prostate Cancer Foundation.


Last updated on