A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Gender based knowledge difference on social-environmental risk: a study on secondary school students of southwest coastal areas of Bangladesh
Authors: Sony, M M Abdullah Al Mamun; Mahzebin, Musammat; Arif, Taimia Binte; Roy, Sukanto; Shuvo, Md Atekul Islam Nur; Rashid, Md Mamunur
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Publication year: 2025
Journal: Social sciences & humanities open
Article number: 101981
Volume: 12
eISSN: 2590-2911
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101981
Publication's open availability at the time of reporting: Open Access
Publication channel's open availability : Open Access publication channel
Web address : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291125007090?via%3Dihub
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/500447529
Self-archived copy's licence: CC BY
Self-archived copy's version: Publisher`s PDF
This study examines gender-based differences in the understanding of social and environmental risks among secondary school students in the southwest coastal region of Bangladesh, a disaster-prone and socioeconomically vulnerable area. Drawing on survey data from 514 students across Khulna, Bagerhat, and Satkhira districts, the study employed independent sample t-tests and chi-square tests to assess differences in knowledge and information sources by gender. The analysis revealed that girls exhibited relatively higher awareness of social risks and mental health issues, while boys demonstrated slightly greater understanding of environmental risks and made more use of digital platforms. School-based learning was the primary source of information for both groups; however, boys more frequently cited online sources, while girls relied more on teachers and family members. The findings underscore how structural inequalities and sociocultural norms shape gendered access to knowledge. The study calls for educational and policy interventions that promote equitable information dissemination, strengthen inclusive risk communication, and address intersectional vulnerabilities in disaster-prone regions.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Funding information in the publication:
Not available.