A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Gender based knowledge difference on social-environmental risk: a study on secondary school students of southwest coastal areas of Bangladesh




AuthorsSony, M M Abdullah Al Mamun; Mahzebin, Musammat; Arif, Taimia Binte; Roy, Sukanto; Shuvo, Md Atekul Islam Nur; Rashid, Md Mamunur

PublisherElsevier BV

Publication year2025

Journal: Social sciences & humanities open

Article number101981

Volume12

eISSN2590-2911

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101981

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingOpen Access

Publication channel's open availability Open Access publication channel

Web address https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291125007090?via%3Dihub

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/500447529

Self-archived copy's licenceCC BY

Self-archived copy's versionPublisher`s PDF


Abstract
This study examines gender-based differences in the understanding of social and environmental risks among secondary school students in the southwest coastal region of Bangladesh, a disaster-prone and socioeconomically vulnerable area. Drawing on survey data from 514 students across Khulna, Bagerhat, and Satkhira districts, the study employed independent sample t-tests and chi-square tests to assess differences in knowledge and information sources by gender. The analysis revealed that girls exhibited relatively higher awareness of social risks and mental health issues, while boys demonstrated slightly greater understanding of environmental risks and made more use of digital platforms. School-based learning was the primary source of information for both groups; however, boys more frequently cited online sources, while girls relied more on teachers and family members. The findings underscore how structural inequalities and sociocultural norms shape gendered access to knowledge. The study calls for educational and policy interventions that promote equitable information dissemination, strengthen inclusive risk communication, and address intersectional vulnerabilities in disaster-prone regions.

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
Not available.


Last updated on 02/01/2026 11:51:10 AM