A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Soil phytolith assemblages reflect palm community composition in western Amazonia




AuthorsMcMichael, Crystal N.H.; Guerra, Daniel; Witteveen, Nina H.; Heijink, Britte M.; Zwarts, Annabel; Zuquim, Gabriela; Balslev, Henrik; Ruokolainen, Kalle; Tuomisto, Hanna

PublisherElsevier BV

Publication year2026

JournalReview of Palaeobotany and Palynology

Article number105443

Volume344

ISSN0034-6667

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2025.105443

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2025.105443

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/500446749


Abstract
Humans have domesticated and used palms in tropical forests for millennia. The extent to which past human palm use affects modern tropical systems remains relatively unexplored due to lack of a good fossil record. However, palms produce an array of phytoliths, which are siliceous cell structures that preserve well in the soil even after the organic plant material has decayed. Phytoliths vary in morphology and can be identified to group level and sometimes even to species. We analyzed if palm phytolith assemblages sampled from the soil reflect palm species compositions and abundances in 63 western Amazonian transects. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and Mantel tests showed that palm communities and phytolith assemblages had similar turnover patterns. Negative binomial generalized linear models indicated that the abundances of nine of the 13 common palm genera were significantly related to a combination of soil cation concentrations, grass phytolith percentages, and palm phytolith PCoA axis scores. These results suggest that phytoliths have potential as quantitative indicators of changes in palm abundances in paleoecological and archaeological reconstructions.

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
C.N.H.M. is funded by ERC Starting Grant 853394, which also supported N.H.W. and B.M.H. H.B. was funded from Natur og Univers, Det Frie Forskningsråd, grant no. 4181-00158 and 9040-00136B and European Commission contract No. 212631. H.T. acknowledges funding from the Research Council of Finland (grants 139959, 273737, and 344733, which was obtained through the BiodivERsA 2019-2020 Joint COFUND CAll and supported G.Z., Aarhus University Research Foundation (grant AUFF-E-2023-7-3, which supported K.R., and the Danish National Research Foundation grant DNRF179.


Last updated on 2025-03-10 at 09:36