A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Proteomic analysis uncovers biological diversity in molecularly defined endometrial carcinomas
Tekijät: Cochrane, Dawn R.; Negri, Gian Luca; Huvila, Jutta; Kalantari, Forouh; Farnell, David A.; Mohammad, Nissreen; Thompson, Emily; Yang, Winnie; Lum, Amy; Spencer, Sandra E.; Riley, Ryan; Jamieson, Amy; Leung, Samuel; Chiu, Derek; Chow, Christine; Lim, Jamie L. P.; Kobel, Martin; Kommoss, Stefan; Kommoss, Friedrich; Gilks, Blake; Hoang, Lien; Huntsman, David G.; Morin, Gregg B.; McAlpine, Jessica N.
Kustantaja: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Julkaisuvuosi: 2025
Lehti: Neoplasia
Artikkelin numero: 101229
Vuosikerta: 69
ISSN: 1522-8002
eISSN: 1476-5586
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2025.101229
Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkellä: Avoimesti saatavilla
Julkaisukanavan avoimuus : Kokonaan avoin julkaisukanava
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2025.101229
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/500361843
While endometrial cancer has an overall favorable prognosis, some patients have poor outcomes and may benefit from further refinements of the current classification systems. Molecular classification stratifies endometrial cancer patients into four prognostic subtypes: POLEmut, MMRd (mismatch repair deficient), p53abn, and NSMP (no specific molecular profile), where patients with POLEmut have the best prognosis and p53abn has the worst prognosis. We used proteomic profiling to assess if additional prognostic or predictive information could be identified across or within molecular subtypes. Global proteome profiling of formalin fixed, paraffin embedded samples, that had clinicopathologic and outcome data, was performed on 184 endometrial cancers encompassing all four molecular subtypes, including replicate samples of the same tumor, and both biopsy and final hysterectomy specimens. To ensure representation of each subtype, we profiled an approximately equal distribution in the 148 unique tumors; 34 (23%) POLEmut, 40 (27%) MMRd, 35 (24%) p53abn and 39 (26%) NSMP, rather than the population-based distributions. There was high reproducibility in the proteomic profiles of intra-tumor replicate samples, and between matched biopsy and hysterectomy tumor samples. Consensus clustering identified four clusters with different prognosis, named 'Adhesion', 'Immune', 'Proliferation', and 'Metabolic' based on the functional characteristics of the enriched proteins. We associated protein expression features with common mutations, molecular subtype, and outcomes. These results demonstrate the biologic diversity within endometrial cancers, both between and within molecular subtypes, and provide candidate features for functional and clinical investigation.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
This work was supported by a Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute Innovation Grant (# 704388). This team has also been supported by the BC Cancer Foundation (Clinician Scientist Award (JMc)), the Chew Wei Chair in Gynecologic Oncology (JMc), the Chew Wei Professorship in Gynecologic Oncology (DGH) and the Canada Research Chairs program (Research Chair in Molecular and Genomic Pathology (DGH), and Molecular stratification of Gynecologic Cancers (JMc)) and the Miller-Mindell Fellowship (AJ). We wish to acknowledge support from the BC Cancer Foundation and the VGH and UBC Hospital Foundation to OVCARE.
