A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

From toxicity assessment to adaptive safety care: implementing comprehensive fast-track safety evaluation for anticancer drug development




AuthorsChampiat, Stéphane; Ouali, Kaissa; Laparra, Ariane; Charalambous, Andreas; Di Palma, Mario; Jordan, Karin; Massard, Christophe; Aapro, Matti; Scotte, Florian

PublisherElsevier BV

Publication year2025

Journal:ESMO Open

Article number105796

Volume10

Issue10

eISSN2059-7029

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105796

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105796

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/500355395


Abstract
Background

The conventional drug development pathway in oncology, spanning 10-15 years, has long been slow, costly, and complex, often marked by late-stage failures due to efficacy or safety concerns.

Materials and methods

We aimed to develop this position paper, based on a literature review and by sharing experience, skills, and works of the different co-authors, in order to propose a new approach to the clinical trials’ process.

Results

In the past decade, the field has undergone major transformation. Innovative trial designs and fast-track regulatory pathways, such as priority review, breakthrough designation, accelerated approval, and fast-track processes, have significantly shortened timelines from phase I to market approval. While these approaches have enabled quicker access to promising therapies, they have also exposed gaps in postmarketing safety and highlighted the need for tailored adverse event management strategies. These emerging safety challenges call for multidisciplinary evaluation and the integration of advanced monitoring technologies.

Conclusions

This manuscript introduces a comprehensive, adaptive fast-track safety evaluation framework designed to support oncology drug development. It aims to enhance patient safety while preserving the benefits of accelerated regulatory pathways.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2025-01-10 at 08:59