A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Co‐Design in the Adaptation of a Clinical Decision Support System to Aid Violence Risk Assessment and Management: A Case Study
Tekijät: Anttila, Minna J.; Ameel, Maria K.; Rautiainen, Tinja; Anttila, Jenni; Maguire, Tessa; Daffern, Michael; Lantta, Tella
Kustantaja: Wiley-Blackwell
Julkaisuvuosi: 2025
Lehti:: Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing
Artikkelin numero: jpm.70023
ISSN: 1351-0126
eISSN: 1365-2850
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.70023
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.70023
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/500039570
Introduction
The electronic application of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) conjoining the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression and the Aggression Prevention Protocol has been shown to be effective in reducing coercion and workplace violence in forensic settings in Australia. However, there is currently a lack of knowledge on the successful implementation of CDSSs across different cultural environments.
AimTo describe the use of co-design in the adaptation of a CDSS, the eDASA+APP-FI in Finland.
MethodThis qualitative case study followed a co-design framework involving a variety of methods, including analysing project data, rapid ethnography, and analysing the notes from co-design workshops.
ResultsThe adaptation of the CDSS into the local context included changes to the training programme and in the frequency of use of the CDSS, as well as linguistic adjustment.
DiscussionThe co-design framework was valuable in identifying adaptation needs and in providing a sense of ownership among staff and consumers.
LimitationsCo-design can be time-consuming in clinical environments.
ImplicationsThe results emphasise the importance of co-design in the identification of adaptation needs as part of the implementation process of a CDSS.
RecommendationsCo-design can be used as a framework when aiming to create a feasible CDSS.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
This work is done under the project ‘eDASA APP FI’, funded by the Finnish Work Environment Fund (210324) and the Finnish Nursing Education Foundation sr and by the Nursing Research Center of Helsinki University Hospital.