A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Assessing forest structural complexity: insights from alternative laser scanning approaches




AuthorsCimdins, Reinis; Yrttimaa, Tuomas; Vastaranta, Mikko; Kankare, Ville

PublisherInforma UK Limited

Publication year2025

JournalScandinavian Journal of Forest Research

ISSN0282-7581

eISSN1651-1891

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2025.2553745

Web address https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2025.2553745

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/500027320


Abstract

This study evaluates the potential of low-altitude airborne laser scanning (ALS) and terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) for characterizing structural complexity in Southern Finland. Unlike species diversity, structural complexity reflects realized niche occupancy by describing how vegetation utilizes light, water, and space, providing key insights into ecosystem functioning. We analyzed 99 circular sample plots (r = 20 m) scanned with helicopter-borne ALS at 80 m altitude and TLS data from nine scan locations per plot. Structural complexity metrics were derived at both grid level (variability in canopy height models and voxel occupancy) and object level (variability in individual tree attributes). High-density ALS effectively captured vertical and horizontal complexity through object-level analysis, showing close agreement with TLS. However, differences in measurement geometry affected volumetric complexity, with ALS and TLS characterizing tree architecture and vegetation occupancy differently. Object-level approaches captured a broader range of horizontal and vertical complexity, while grid-level approaches better captured volumetric variability, facilitating the identification of forest stand properties and biodiversity hotspots. The strongest agreement between ALS and TLS occurred for variation in tree height (R² = 0.66, Spearman = 0.80), while lowest agreement was found for fractal dimensions of tree architecture (R² = 0.04, Spearman = 0.25).


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
This work was funded by the Research Council of Finland through the Diversity4Forests project [grant number 348643].


Last updated on 2025-19-09 at 09:10