A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

History of Oral Mucosal Lesions in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients




AuthorsKeinänen, Arvi; Snäll, Johanna; Hagström, Jaana; Uittamo, Johanna

PublisherQuintessence Publishing

Publication year2025

JournalOral Health and Preventive Dentistry

Journal name in sourceOral health & preventive dentistry

Journal acronymOral Health Prev Dent

Volume23

First page 291

Last page297

ISSN1602-1622

eISSN1757-9996

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2028

Web address https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2028

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/499891898


Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the occurrence of previous mucosal dysplasia in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and to charaterise patient profile, types of previous oral mucosal lesions, and care-seeking in relation to earlier mucosal findings.

Materials and methods: Retrospective data of OSCC patients with a primary tumour were collected. The primary outcome variable was any history of oral mucosal findings; the secondary outcome variable was a history of previous oral mucosal dysplasia. The primary predictor variable was the mode of seeking treatment. Patient and tumour-related variables were compared between patients with and without anamnestic mucosal changes or findings.

Results: A total of 528 patients were included in the study. Of these patients, 169 (32.0%) had a history of an oral mucosal lesion. Oral mucosal dysplasia was detected in 34 patients (6.4%) before the OSCC diagnosis. Patients who had a history of heavy alcohol use were less likely to have a history of any mucosal lesions or dysplasia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.350, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.215-0.571, p 0.001 and aOR 0.235, 95% CI 0.070-0.795, p = 0.020). Tumours were detected more often in conjunction with routine appointments in patients with a history of any mucosal lesions (aOR 2.671, 95% CI 1.704-4.187, p 0.001) and in those with previously detected dysplasia (aOR 6.195, 95% CI 3.004-12.774, p 0.001).

Conclusions: The results emphasise the importance of careful examination and close follow-up of findings in the oral mucosa.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
The Helsinki University Hospital Research Fund financially supported this work. Open access was funded by Helsinki University Library.


Last updated on 2025-19-09 at 12:09