A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Diagnostic reference levels for dental cone-beam computed tomography: current state and way forward




AuthorsTrindade, Hugo; Eneh, Chibuzor Toivo Mark; Camilleri, Mona Lisa; Tsaggari, Eirini; Gilligan, Paddy; Pauwels, Ruben

PublisherElsevier

Publication year2025

Journal: Physica Medica

Journal name in sourcePhysica Medica

Article number105072

Volume137

ISSN1120-1797

eISSN1724-191X

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105072

Publication's open availability at the time of reportingNo Open Access

Publication channel's open availability Partially Open Access publication channel

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105072

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/499813549


Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive overview of Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) for dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), addressing the current variability and challenges associated with their implementation. Data were collected through a survey conducted among members of the Dental Imaging Special Interest Group of the European Federation of Organizations for Medical Physics, encompassing 33 countries, not limited to Europe. The focus was on official DRL documentation issued by regulatory or authorized bodies and peer-reviewed publications based on data from more than ten CBCT units.

Official DRLs were identified in Finland, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Greece, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Japan, Switzerland, and Estonia. DRLs were analyzed using two primary classification schemes: by field of view (FOV) dimensions and by clinical application or indication. The application of differing methodologies across countries was a key finding. In the clinical application-based group DRLs ranged from 200 mGy·cm2 for imaging a single jaw quadrant in Sweden to 1150 mGy·cm2 for paranasal sinus imaging in Finland. The United Kingdom was the only country to establish pediatric-specific DRLs. For FOV-based DRLs, values ranged from 500 mGy·cm2 for FOVs ≤ 25 cm2, in Germany, to 1960 mGy·cm2 for a > 100 cm2 FOVs, in Japan. The variability in exposure parameters and data reporting practices complicates cross-country comparisons.

To improve radiation safety, the harmonization of DRLs is essential. Increased international collaboration, the standardization of dose metrics, and enhanced training for dental professionals are critical steps toward the implementation of evidence-based DRLs and the optimization of CBCT practices worldwide.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 02/12/2025 09:40:15 AM