A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Validation of the Swiss-Finnish Bariatric Metabolic Outcome Score within a large prospective registry cohort




AuthorsBruinsma Floris F E; Hurme Saija; Peterli Ralph; Stenberg Erik; Nienhuijs Simon W; Grönroos Sofia; Våge Villy; Bueter Marco; Ottosson Johan; Liem Ronald S L; Salminen Paulina

PublisherOxford University Press (OUP)

Publishing placeOXFORD

Publication year2025

JournalBritish Journal of Surgery

Journal name in sourceBritish Journal of Surgery

Journal acronymBJS-BRIT J SURG

Article numberznaf106

Volume112

Issue6

Number of pages8

ISSN0007-1323

eISSN1365-2168

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf106

Web address https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf106


Abstract

Background: The Swiss-Finnish Bariatric Metabolic Outcome Score (SF-BARI Score), based on merged data of two RCTs, is a composite endpoint designed to evaluate and categorize outcomes after metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). The aim of this study was to externally validate the score using registry data.

Methods: Individual patient data were included from the Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity, the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registries (SOReg-Sweden and SOReg-Norway), and the merged RCT data used for establishing the SF-BARI Score. All patients undergoing primary MBS from January 2010 to June 2018, with complete baseline characteristics, as well as complete 1- and 5-year follow-up data, were included. The mean total score and distribution were compared between the combined registry and merged RCT data.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the mean SF-BARI Score between the registries (21 603 patients) and merged RCTs (457 patients) at 5 years (90.9 versus 89.1 points; difference = 1.8 (95% c.i. -1.0 to 4.7); P = 0.212), and the score distribution was similar. Statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics existed regarding sex (male 20.9% versus 29.3%), type 2 diabetes (16.7% versus 33.9%), hypertension (30.4% versus 66.1%), dyslipidaemia (13.7% versus 46.5%), obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (12.0% versus 17.4%), and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) rate (21.0% versus 49.9%) (P < 0.001). The mean score estimate at 5 years in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was 11.2 (95% c.i. 10.2 to 12.2) points higher compared with SG (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study verified the feasibility of the SF-BARI Score, enabling standardized reporting and allowing for comparison of different treatment modalities.


Funding information in the publication
Funding was provided by the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation (a research grant to P.S.).


Last updated on 2025-19-08 at 15:38