B1 Other refereed article (e.g., editorial, letter, comment) in a scientific journal

The European nutrition research landscape: diversity and perspectives




AuthorsPerez-Cueto, Federico J. A.; Brennan, Sarah F.; Laitinen, Kirsi; Diercks, Jutta; Spiroski, Igor; Katic, Masenjka; Fallaize, Rosalind; Garin, Jean-Paul; Cvejic, Jelena Helene; Pourshahidi, L. Kirsti; Bordoni, Alessandra; Ockhuizen, Theo; Daniel, Hannelore; Sobajic, Sladana; FENS WG2

PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC

Publishing placeHEIDELBERG

Publication year2025

JournalEuropean Journal of Nutrition

Journal name in sourceEuropean Journal of Nutrition

Journal acronymEUR J NUTR

Article number240

Volume64

Issue5

Number of pages12

ISSN1436-6207

eISSN1436-6215

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-025-03681-2

Web address https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-025-03681-2


Abstract

PPurpose

The diversification of Nutrition Sciences (NS) in recent decades has highlighted the need to review current practices in relation to funding, communication and interaction with stakeholders. The Federation of European Nutrition Societies (FENS) Presidential Activity “Improving standards in the science of nutrition” established three working groups to develop consensus documents. This paper is part of Working Group 2 (WG2) “Organisation, Capabilities and Funding” and aims at describing the European Nutrition Research Landscape, addressing its diversity, challenges and future perspectives.

Methods

WG2 developed two rounds of questionnaires designed to map the current funding architecture in FENS member countries. Questionnaires were administered to representatives of national NS member societies in 2022 and desk research was carried out to describe the main European Union (EU) sources of funding. Qualitative data analysis was performed on questionnaire data collected and agreed and approved by WG2.

Results

42% of representatives responded to the first round of data collection, and 30% to the second round of data collection. Results indicate that the NS field is mainly funded by public agencies, private actors, and by contract. Most calls are multi-disciplinary and the majority of societies were aware of risks posed by engagement with the private sector and financial conflicts of interest (COI).

Conclusion

This exercise provides an insight into the funding landscape across Europe for NS and highlights the uniquely multifaceted funding sources and dynamics across the continent. This work also underscores the challenges NS faces and progress made with issues surrounding COI and the associated reputation of NS.


Funding information in the publication
We are thankful to FENS Secretariat, in particular to Ms. Tracy Bogan and Ms. Erica Ng, who kindly compiled and privided historical information about FENS for this paper. We also acknowledge the early contribution of Dr. Ilona Faber. This paper is part of the FENS Presidential Activity "Improving the Standards of Nutrition Science", more specifically, it is a result of Working Group 2 "Organisation, Capabilities and Funding". The participation of WG2 members has been voluntary. The Foundation Nutrition in Transition supported a WG2 meeting in April 2023 that consolidated this communication. FENS contributed to the registration, travel and accommodation expenses related to presenting the progress of WG2 at ICN2022 (Tokyo) and ECN2023 (Belgrade).


Last updated on 2025-22-08 at 13:10