B1 Other refereed article (e.g., editorial, letter, comment) in a scientific journal
The European nutrition research landscape: diversity and perspectives
Authors: Perez-Cueto, Federico J. A.; Brennan, Sarah F.; Laitinen, Kirsi; Diercks, Jutta; Spiroski, Igor; Katic, Masenjka; Fallaize, Rosalind; Garin, Jean-Paul; Cvejic, Jelena Helene; Pourshahidi, L. Kirsti; Bordoni, Alessandra; Ockhuizen, Theo; Daniel, Hannelore; Sobajic, Sladana; FENS WG2
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Publishing place: HEIDELBERG
Publication year: 2025
Journal: European Journal of Nutrition
Journal name in source: European Journal of Nutrition
Journal acronym: EUR J NUTR
Article number: 240
Volume: 64
Issue: 5
Number of pages: 12
ISSN: 1436-6207
eISSN: 1436-6215
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-025-03681-2
Web address : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-025-03681-2
PPurpose
The diversification of Nutrition Sciences (NS) in recent decades has highlighted the need to review current practices in relation to funding, communication and interaction with stakeholders. The Federation of European Nutrition Societies (FENS) Presidential Activity “Improving standards in the science of nutrition” established three working groups to develop consensus documents. This paper is part of Working Group 2 (WG2) “Organisation, Capabilities and Funding” and aims at describing the European Nutrition Research Landscape, addressing its diversity, challenges and future perspectives.
Methods
WG2 developed two rounds of questionnaires designed to map the current funding architecture in FENS member countries. Questionnaires were administered to representatives of national NS member societies in 2022 and desk research was carried out to describe the main European Union (EU) sources of funding. Qualitative data analysis was performed on questionnaire data collected and agreed and approved by WG2.
Results
42% of representatives responded to the first round of data collection, and 30% to the second round of data collection. Results indicate that the NS field is mainly funded by public agencies, private actors, and by contract. Most calls are multi-disciplinary and the majority of societies were aware of risks posed by engagement with the private sector and financial conflicts of interest (COI).
Conclusion
This exercise provides an insight into the funding landscape across Europe for NS and highlights the uniquely multifaceted funding sources and dynamics across the continent. This work also underscores the challenges NS faces and progress made with issues surrounding COI and the associated reputation of NS.
Funding information in the publication:
We are thankful to FENS Secretariat, in particular to Ms. Tracy Bogan and Ms. Erica Ng, who kindly compiled and privided historical information about FENS for this paper. We also acknowledge the early contribution of Dr. Ilona Faber. This paper is part of the FENS Presidential Activity "Improving the Standards of Nutrition Science", more specifically, it is a result of Working Group 2 "Organisation, Capabilities and Funding". The participation of WG2 members has been voluntary. The Foundation Nutrition in Transition supported a WG2 meeting in April 2023 that consolidated this communication. FENS contributed to the registration, travel and accommodation expenses related to presenting the progress of WG2 at ICN2022 (Tokyo) and ECN2023 (Belgrade).