A2 Vertaisarvioitu katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Cross-national research on adolescent mental health: a systematic review comparing research in low, middle and high-income countries




TekijätZhang, Xiao; Mori, Yuko; Abio, Anne; Khorasani, Zahra Kafami; Gilbert, Sonja; Grimland, Meytal; Bezborodovs, Nikita; Wan Mohd Yunus, Wan Mohd Azam; Silwal, Sanju; Westerlund, Minja; Praharaj, Samir Kumar; Ndetei, David M.; Kaneko, Hitoshi; Heinonen, Emmi; Sourander, Andre

KustantajaBMJ PUBLISHING GROUP

KustannuspaikkaLONDON

Julkaisuvuosi2025

JournalBMJ Global Health

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiBMJ GLOBAL HEALTH

Lehden akronyymiBMJ GLOB HEALTH

Artikkelin numeroe019267

Vuosikerta10

Numero7

Sivujen määrä12

eISSN2059-7908

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019267

Verkko-osoitehttps://gh.bmj.com/content/10/7/e019267

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/499184296


Tiivistelmä

Background: Although 90% of the global adolescent population resides in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), cross-national mental health research has primarily focused on high-income countries. This systematic review aims to examine cross-national studies, including LMICs, focusing on adolescent mental health and psychosocial problems.

Methods: Peer-reviewed articles comparing adolescent mental health or psychosocial issues across countries were included if published in English and based on observational study designs. Six databases were searched from inception to January 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI tool and additional cross-national quality criteria. A narrative synthesis was conducted following the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis guidelines.

Results: The search identified 172 studies including data from over 12 million adolescents across 166 countries. The most used international survey was the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study, and most studies employed cross-sectional designs with school-based, self-reported questionnaires. Adolescent mental health research involved 166 countries, while 52 countries were not represented in any of the studies. The inclusion of LMICs in cross-national research increased over time. Internalising problems and bullying were well-researched topics, but studies on externalising behaviours were limited. The number of publications increased over time, particularly after 2020. Variations by income level were observed, with traditional bullying more prevalent in LMICs.

Discussion: This review provides important insights into global patterns and gaps in adolescent mental health research. It highlights the need to address methodological heterogeneity, including the use of validated and culturally adapted measures, comprehensive reporting of sampling procedures, sample sizes, response rates and greater attention to generalisability. In addition, the targeted inclusion of under-represented regions is essential to addressing global disparities and informing effective interventions.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024505077.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
The study was supported by the INVEST Flagship program of the Research Council of Finland (decision number: 345546) and the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (decision number: 101020767).


Last updated on 2025-08-08 at 14:58