A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Postbiotics: a perspective on their quantification




TekijätVinderola, Gabriel; Benkowski, Andrzej; Bernardeau, Marion; Chenoll, Empar; Collado, Maria Carmen; Cronin, Ultan; Eckhardt, Erik; Green, Justin B.; Ipharraguerre, Ignacio R.; Kemperman, Rober; Lacroix, Christophe; Minami, Junichi; Wilkinson, Martin; Sanders, Mary Ellen; Salminen, Seppo

KustantajaFRONTIERS MEDIA SA

KustannuspaikkaLAUSANNE

Julkaisuvuosi2025

JournalFrontiers in Nutrition

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiFRONTIERS IN NUTRITION

Lehden akronyymiFRONT NUTR

Artikkelin numero1582733

Vuosikerta12

Sivujen määrä12

eISSN2296-861X

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1582733

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1582733

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/499176623


Tiivistelmä

A "postbiotic" is a preparation of inanimate microorganisms and/or their components that confers a health benefit on the host. To encourage collaborative problem-solving to address the issues related to the characterization and quantification of postbiotics, a working group of academic and industry scientists involved in research or commercial production of postbiotics convened at the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) 2024 meeting. This paper reports the outcomes of that discussion. Postbiotics are potentially compositionally complex mixtures, leading us to anticipate that full characterization and quantification of all components of a postbiotic product is not feasible. However, confirmation of the identity and quantity of the progenitor microorganism(s), quantification of some of its functional components, and a suitable description of the process of inactivation will be needed to assure the product can be sufficiently described and consistently reproduced. Measurement and quantification must be fit for purpose. Some useful methods include flow cytometry (FC), including innovations such as imaging FC, which has evolved into a mainstream technique suited to quantify inanimate cells, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction, which complements FC by enabling quantification and identity of microbes to the strain level. Other methods can be utilized depending on the complexity, type of microorganisms used (bacteria, yeasts, filamentous fungi), number of strains and cell integrity (intact vs. fragmented). Hence, no 'gold standard' methodology - analogous to colony-forming units for probiotics - is envisioned for postbiotics. This perspective focuses on the required microbial composition of postbiotics, not on the optional metabolite components, which can be measured using well-established methods. We propose a decision tree to aid deliberation among different quantification methods for postbiotics under development and being commercialized. We recognize that the evolution of technologies will likely result in future refinement of this decision tree, and we emphasize that our intent is not to prescribe a rigid framework, but rather to provide guiding principles on approaches to quantifying postbiotics.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. ISAPP funded article publication fees and travel costs for academic participants to attend the 2024 ISAPP meeting, which hosted these discussions.



The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. ISAPP funded article publication fees and travel costs for academic participants to attend the 2024 ISAPP meeting, which hosted these discussions.


Last updated on 2025-29-08 at 10:52