A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

The philosophical health compass: A new and comprehensive assessment tool for researching existential dimensions of wellbeing




Authorsde Miranda, Luis; Ingvolstad, Malmgren Charlotta; Carroll, Jonathan Eric; Gould, Caroline S; King, Rodney; Funke, Christian; Arslan, Sena

PublisherSAGE Publications

Publication year2025

JournalMethodological innovations

Journal name in sourceMethodological Innovations

ISSN2059-7991

eISSN2059-7991

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1177/20597991251352420

Web address https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991251352420

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/499139078


Abstract

This paper introduces the Philosophical Health Compass (PHC), a quantitative assessment tool designed to complement qualitative research methods in investigating philosophical aspects of human wellbeing. The PHC evaluates six dimensions of philosophical health identified through previous research: bodily sense, sense of self, sense of belonging, sense of the possible, sense of purpose, and philosophical sense. While qualitative approaches in philosophical health excel at capturing rich individual narratives, their limitations in standardization and scalability constrain systematic research across populations. The PHC addresses this methodological gap by translating comprehensive philosophical concepts into measurable variables, enabling researchers to conduct comparative analyses, and integrate philosophical dimensions into an established wellbeing framework. This instrument is grounded in the SMILE_PH interview methodology introduced in 2023 by Luis de Miranda in the present journal, which has indicated through extensive field application that philosophical and existential health can be systematically explored through these six interrelated dimensions. We present the compass, its theoretical foundations, methodology, and potential research applications. By offering a standardized approach to evaluating philosophical wellbeing, the PHC creates new possibilities for interdisciplinary research while acknowledging that this questionnaire is not meant to replace the depth of the qualitative SMILE_PH dialogue, but rather to facilitate it.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions grant agreement No. 101081293.


Last updated on 2025-07-08 at 11:05