A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Giant cell arteritis in Finland from 2010 to 2020: incidence, developing diagnostic methods and disease presentation




AuthorsKivitalo, Lauri; Taimen, Kirsi; Sokka-Isler, Tuulikki; Kerola, Anne; Rautavaara, Joonas; Pirilä, Laura; Kauppi, Markku; Malila, Joel; Haara, Laura; Ryyppö, Laura; Kotijärvi, Taina; Saarenketo, Panu; Saarivaara, Hannu; Siltanen, Juho; Helminen, Mika; Rutanen, Jarno; Isomäki, Pia

PublisherOxford University Press (OUP)

Publication year2025

JournalRheumatology Advances in Practice

Journal name in sourceRheumatology Advances in Practice

Article numberrkaf055

Volume9

Issue2

ISSN 2514-1775

eISSN2514-1775

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkaf055

Web address https://academic.oup.com/rheumap/article/9/2/rkaf055/8132960#522694033

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/499094843


Abstract

Objectives
To study the annual incidence, diagnostic methods used and clinical presentation of giant cell arteritis (GCA) over time in Finland.

Methods
Newly diagnosed GCA patients from 2010 to 2020 were retrospectively identified from four healthcare districts in Finland. Medical records were reviewed and data on incidence, diagnostic methods, phenotype [cranial vs large vessel (LV)-GCA] and clinical presentation were analysed.

Results
We identified 602 newly diagnosed GCA patients. The annual incidence was 9.0 cases/100 000 persons (95% CI 8.3, 9.7) ≥50 years of age and was significantly higher in the period 2016–2020 compared with the period 2010–2015 [11.3 (95% CI 10.1, 12.5) vs 7.0 (95% CI 6.2, 7.9), P < 0.001]. Imaging- or biopsy-confirmed diagnosis was recorded in 75% of GCA patients, while 25% had a clinical diagnosis. The proportion of imaging- or biopsy-confirmed diagnoses increased over time [64.7% (2010–2015) vs 82.2% (2016–2020)] while that of clinical diagnoses decreased. The use of imaging methods increased while the use of temporal artery biopsies decreased between the two time periods. LV-GCA was discovered more often in the period 2016–2020 when compared with 2010–2015 (34.0% vs 19.3% of patients).

Conclusion
The incidence of GCA increased during the study period, as well as the proportion of imaging- or biopsy-confirmed diagnoses, probably due to more frequent use of advanced imaging methods. Additionally, patients with LV-GCA were more commonly identified.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
This study was financially supported by Tampere University Hospital Support Foundation, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of Southwest Finland, Wellbeing Services County of South Ostrobothnia, Rheumatic Disease Research Foundation in Finland (Reumatautien tutkimussäätiö) and Finnish Rheumatism Association.


Last updated on 2025-14-08 at 13:31