A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Multicentre evaluation of deep learning CT autosegmentation of the head and neck region for radiotherapy
Tekijät: Pang, Eric Pei Ping; Tan, Hong Qi; Wang, Fuqiang; Niemelä, Jarkko; Bolard, Gregory; Ramadan, Susan; Kiljunen, Timo; Capala, Marta; Petit, Steven; Seppala, Jan; Vuolukka, Kristiina; Kiitam, Ingrid; Zolotuhhin, Danil; Gershkevitsh, Eduard; Lehtiö, Kaisa; Nikkinen, Juha; Keyriläinen, Jani; Mokka, Miia; Chua, Melvin Lee Kiang
Kustantaja: NATURE PORTFOLIO
Kustannuspaikka: BERLIN
Julkaisuvuosi: 2025
Lehti:: npj Digital Medicine
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE
Lehden akronyymi: NPJ DIGIT MED
Artikkelin numero: 312
Vuosikerta: 8
Numero: 1
Sivujen määrä: 11
eISSN: 2398-6352
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01624-z
Verkko-osoite: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-025-01624-z
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/498728007
This is a multi-institutional study to evaluate a head-and-neck CT auto-segmentation software across seven institutions globally. 11 lymph node levels and 7 organs-at-risk contours were evaluated in a two-phase study design. Time savings were measured in both phases, and the inter-observer variability across the seven institutions was quantified in phase two. Overall time savings were found to be 42% in phase one and 49% in phase two. Lymph node levels IA, IB, III, IVA, and IVB showed no significant time savings, with some centers reporting longer editing times than manual delineation. All the edited ROIs showed reduced inter-observer variability compared to manual segmentation. Our study shows that auto-segmentation plays a crucial role in harmonizing contouring practices globally. However, the clinical benefits of auto-segmentation software vary significantly across ROIs and between clinics. To maximize its potential, institution-specific commissioning is required to optimize the clinical benefits.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
