A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Reconciling democracy and sustainability: three political challenges and the role of democratic innovations
Tekijät: Marquardt, Jens; Pfeiffer, Frederik; Blum, Mareike; Daw, Tim M.; Dugasseh, Frank Akowuge; Heitzig, Jobst; Hysing, Erik; Jensen, Ingrid Helene Brandt; Kulha, Katariina; Langkjaer, Frederik; Lindvall, Daniel; Nasiritousi, Naghmeh; Schlosberg, David; Toikka, Arho; Tonder, Lars
Kustantaja: TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Kustannuspaikka: ABINGDON
Julkaisuvuosi: 2025
Journal: Sustainability : Science, Practice and Policy
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: SUSTAINABILITY-SCIENCE PRACTICE AND POLICY
Lehden akronyymi: SUSTAINABILITY-SCI P
Artikkelin numero: 2504239
Vuosikerta: 21
Numero: 1
Sivujen määrä: 21
eISSN: 1548-7733
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2025.2504239
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2025.2504239
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/498724362
Governing sustainability challenges such as climate change or biodiversity loss presents a profound democratic dilemma. Although democratic practices and procedures are widely regarded as essential for collectively addressing complex sustainability issues, liberal democracies have been criticized by some scholars for their inability to effectively tackle global environmental threats like climate change. We reconcile these positions by outlining how the emerging field of democratic innovations can help to address the critical challenges that democracies face when governing sustainability transformations. We focus on three issues liberal democracies are confronted with: reformist incrementalism, (de)politicization, and imaginary boundaries. We then exemplify how democratic innovations such as deliberative mini-publics, participatory budgeting, and material participation can help address these challenges. Our review suggests that democratic innovations hold the potential to address political concerns, find compromises between extreme positions, reconnect people's everyday lives with the grand sustainability challenges they face, and allow for alternative visions of a desirable future society. However, we also address cautionary tales, discuss the limitations of democratic innovations, and outline avenues for future research, which we believe can help further elaborate and develop participatory approaches to critical sustainability challenges.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
This work was supported by the research program FAIRTRANS, funded by a grant from Mistra (DIA 2019/28) and Formas via the national research program on climate (2021‑00416). This work was also funded by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency’s environmental research fund (2022‑00115). Funding from TU Darmstadt’s Athene Young Investigator Program generously covered the open‑access fee.
