A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Effects of Cholinesterase Inhibitor Medication on QTc Interval in Memory Clinic Patients




TekijätIsotalo, Hanna Karita; Lehtovaara, Joanna Karoliina; Ekblad, Laura Linnea; Nuotio, Maria Susanna; Langén, Ville Lauri Johannes

KustantajaSAGE PUBLICATIONS INC

KustannuspaikkaTHOUSAND OAKS

Julkaisuvuosi2025

JournalAnnals of Pharmacotherapy

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY

Lehden akronyymiANN PHARMACOTHER

Sivujen määrä11

ISSN1060-0280

eISSN1542-6270

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1177/10600280251328530

Verkko-osoitehttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/10600280251328530

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/498580773


Tiivistelmä

Background: Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs)-donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine-are beneficial in treating Alzheimer disease (AD). However, due to their impact on extra-cerebral acetylcholine signaling, concerns about cardiac adverse effects, including QT interval prolongation, persist. Despite this, evidence-based guidelines for electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring during ChEI treatment are lacking, and prior studies on ChEIs and corrected QT intervals (QTc) yield inconsistent findings.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association between ChEI use and changes in QTc intervals among older adults.

Methods: We collected retrospective data from first-time visitors to the geriatric memory clinic of Turku City Hospital in 2017 and 2019. We included patients who were newly prescribed ChEIs and had ECG data available (n = 126, mean age 81.1 years, 56.3% female). QTc prolongation was defined as >= 460 ms in females and >= 450 ms in men. Paired t tests compared QTc means before and during ChEI use, and McNemar tests analyzed changes in the proportion of prolonged QTc.

Results: Mean +/- SD QTc (ms) before versus during ChEI use was: 420.8 +/- 24.0 versus 423.9 +/- 28.0 (P = .13) for donepezil; 416.0 +/- 20.4 versus 416.5 +/- 26.1 (P = .92) for galantamine; 416.1 +/- 22.3 versus 409.6 +/- 20.1 (P = .30) for rivastigmine; and 419.7 +/- 23.4 versus 421.5 +/- 27.3 (P = .34) for all ChEIs. Prolonged QTc occurred in 7.9% of patients before versus 12.7% during ChEI use (P = .21).

Conclusion and Relevance: We found no statistically significant association between ChEI use and QTc interval prolongation or an increased proportion of pathological QTc values during ChEI treatment. Larger studies are warranted to establish evidence-based recommendations on ECG monitoring during ChEI medication.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Karita Isotalo was supported by a grant from the Betania Foundation. Laura Ekblad was supported by the Finnish Medical Foundation and by Finnish Governmental Research Funding. Ville Langén was supported by a grant from the State Research Funding of the Turku University Hospital expert responsibility area.


Last updated on 2025-25-06 at 10:12