A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Use of polyethylene glycol precipitation and ultracentrifugation to enhance the sensitivity of hepatitis B virus DNA detection




TekijätFu, Michael X.; Larralde, Osmany; Mayne, Richard; Kean, Kai; Reid, Kaitlin; Andersson, Monique; Golubchik, Tanya; McKeating, Jane A.; Jarvis, Lisa; Irving, William L.; Simmonds, Peter; Harvala, Heli

KustantajaElsevier BV

Julkaisuvuosi2025

JournalJournal of Clinical Virology

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiJournal of Clinical Virology

Artikkelin numero105802

Vuosikerta178

ISSN1386-6532

eISSN1873-5967

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105802

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105802

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/498410249


Tiivistelmä

Background: Sensitive molecular detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA is crucial for diagnosing and managing occult hepatitis. To improve the sensitivity of HBV DNA detection, we compared the effectiveness of polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation and ultracentrifugation to concentrate DNA prior to extraction.

Methods: Twenty-three HBV DNA-positive samples with low viral loads were compared between the extraction of standard (0.2 mL) and larger volumes (5 mL) of plasma, through PEG precipitation of 10 mL and 20 mL of plasma, and ultracentrifugation from 35 mL of plasma. The effectiveness of the methods for HBV DNA detection was assayed by quantitative PCR. For genetic characterisation, Sanger sequencing of amplicons and targeted Illumina sequencing were used. Costs, sample capacities, and turnaround times were compared.

Results: DNA was detected in a greater number of samples using PEG and ultracentrifugation (detecting up to all 23 samples) compared to more standard extraction methods (detecting at least 18 samples). Efficiencies of recovery of HBV DNA from samples were comparable in all concentration methods. HBV and other DNA viruses, such as human herpesviruses and anelloviruses, were detected in samples and at higher read counts with PEG concentration than without. The availability, cost, relative simplicity, and throughput of PEG precipitation conferred further advantages to ultracentrifugation.

Conclusions: PEG precipitation from large volumes of plasma is a practical and economical alternative to ultracentrifugation and could be a similarly effective concentration method for low viral load samples in blood donation and clinical virology laboratories.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
This work and authors [Michael X Fu, Richard Mayne, Kai Kean, Kaitlin Reid, Tanya Golubchik, Peter Simmonds, Heli Harvala] was supported by the National Institutes for Health and Care Research [grant number NIHR203338]. The funding body had no role in the study's design, data collection, analysis, or manuscript writing.


Last updated on 2025-11-06 at 11:33