A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Creation Processes of Professional Artists and Art Students in Sculpting
Tekijät: Linda Puppe, Helen Jossberger, Hans Gruber
Kustantaja: SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
Julkaisuvuosi: 2021
Journal: Empirical Studies of the Arts
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: EMPIRICAL STUDIES OF THE ARTS
Lehden akronyymi: EMPIR STUD ARTS
Artikkelin numero: ARTN 0276237420942716
Vuosikerta: 39
Numero: 2
Aloitussivu: 171
Lopetussivu: 193
Sivujen määrä: 23
ISSN: 0276-2374
eISSN: 1541-4493
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237420942716
Verkko-osoite: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0276237420942716
Tiivistelmä
In some creative domains, it is easy to make performance visible. For example, musician can be observed while they perform. In other domains, such as sculpting, less is known about the creation process. The objective of the present study was to analyze how professional artists and students in sculpting differ in their perception and in their creation processes as well as how perception and creation processes are related to each other. Ten experts, 10 intermediates, and 10 novices participated. First, participants' eye movements while looking at a stimulus were recorded with a remote eye-tracker. Second, they explained which elements of the stimulus were of particular interest for creating a sculpture. Third, they had to create their own sculpture. Finally, questions were asked about their creation processes. The results showed differences between the three groups regarding the start-up period, use of the stimulus, working process, reflection of problems, and final sculptures.
In some creative domains, it is easy to make performance visible. For example, musician can be observed while they perform. In other domains, such as sculpting, less is known about the creation process. The objective of the present study was to analyze how professional artists and students in sculpting differ in their perception and in their creation processes as well as how perception and creation processes are related to each other. Ten experts, 10 intermediates, and 10 novices participated. First, participants' eye movements while looking at a stimulus were recorded with a remote eye-tracker. Second, they explained which elements of the stimulus were of particular interest for creating a sculpture. Third, they had to create their own sculpture. Finally, questions were asked about their creation processes. The results showed differences between the three groups regarding the start-up period, use of the stimulus, working process, reflection of problems, and final sculptures.
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali