A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Factors affecting the performance of a novel artificial intelligence-based coronary computed tomography-derived ischaemia algorithm




AuthorsKiatkittikul, Peerapon; Maaniitty, Teemu; Bär, Sarah; Nabeta, Takeru; Bax, Jeroen J; Saraste, Antti; Knuuti, Juhani

PublisherOxford University Press (OUP)

Publication year2024

JournalEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice

Journal name in sourceEuropean Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice

Volume2

Issue4

eISSN2755-9637

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf033

Web address https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf033


Abstract

Aims: AI-QCTischaemia is an FDA-cleared novel artificial intelligence-guided method that utilizes features from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to predict myocardial ischaemia.

Objective: To identify factors associated with discrepancy between AI-QCTischaemia and positron emission tomography (PET) perfusion.

Methods and results: Six hundred and sixty-two patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) on CCTA and undergoing [15O]H2O PET were analysed using AI-QCTischaemia. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with discrepancy. Perfusion homogeneity was measured by relative flow reserve. A total of 209 (32%) patients showed discrepancies: 62 (9%) exhibited normal AI-QCTischaemia but abnormal perfusion (false negative AI-QCTischaemia), whereas 147 (22%) had abnormal AI-QCTischaemia despite normal perfusion (false positive AI-QCTischaemia). False positive AI-QCTischaemia patients (vs. true positive) were more often females, older, with less typical angina, and less advanced CAD. In multivariable analysis, typical angina [OR 95% CI: 1.796 (1.015-3.179), P = 0.044], diameter stenosis per 1% increase [1.058 (1.036-1.080), P < 0.001], and percent atheroma volume per 1% increase [1.103 (1.051-1.158), P < 0.001] significantly predicted true positive, while age was inversely associated [0.955 (0.923-0.989), P = 0.010]. False-negative AI-QCTischaemia patients (vs. true negative) were more often males, smokers, with less good CCTA image quality, and more advanced CAD. However, none was significant in multivariable analysis. Furthermore, false-negative AI-QCTischaemia showed more homogenously reduced perfusion by relative flow reserve compared to true positive (median ± IQR: 0.68 ± 0.15 vs. 0.56 ± 0.23, P < 0.001) and 21 (34%) of false negative showed globally reduced perfusion.

Conclusion: For abnormal AI-QCTischaemia, younger age, typical angina, more severe stenosis, and more extensive atherosclerosis predicted abnormal PET perfusion. With false negative AI-QCTischaemia, perfusion abnormalities were partly explained by microvascular disease.

Keywords: AI-QCTischaemia; coronary artery disease; coronary computed tomography angiography; oxygen-15 water; positron emission tomography


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
The study was financially supported by the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research and Finnish State Research Funding [VTR 13403]. Dr Kiatkittikul was supported by Chulabhorn Royal Academy. Cleerly, Inc. performed the CCTA image analysis without costs and provided an unrestricted grant to the research team.


Last updated on 2025-19-06 at 13:55