A2 Refereed review article in a scientific journal

Cardiac output limits maximal oxygen consumption, but what limits maximal cardiac output?




AuthorsHeinonen, Ilkka

PublisherWILEY

Publishing placeHOBOKEN

Publication year2025

JournalExperimental Physiology

Journal name in sourceEXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY

Journal acronymEXP PHYSIOL

Volume110

Issue5

First page 666

Last page674

Number of pages9

ISSN0958-0670

eISSN1469-445X

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1113/EP091594

Web address https://doi.org/10.1113/EP091594

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/492242328


Abstract
Maximal oxygen uptake/consumption is an important variable determining exercise performance. It is generally considered to be limited largely, but not exclusively, by maximal cardiac output (CO), which limits the ability of heart to pump oxygen-rich arterial blood to working muscles. Cardiac output is a product of heart rate and stroke volume, which is the amount of blood ejected from the heart by one heart beat. Exercise training, especially of the endurance type, can increase maximal CO substantially. A straightforward way for the heart to increase maximal CO would be to increase maximal heart rate, but this does not happen; instead, maximal heart rate tends to be reduced after training. This is because heart rate is the most important determinant of myocardial oxygen consumption, and ventricular filling and myocardial blood flow (MBF) would be compromised by further increases in heart rate, given that MBF is blunted by contractions and occurs principally during diastole. Myocardial oxygen extraction is already high at rest and is increased further in endurance-trained athletes, making their hearts even more dependent on increases in MBF. The trained heart therefore also shows reduced MBF, enhanced blood mean transit time and higher myocardial vascular resistance at rest and during submaximal exercise, although MBF reserve is not improved. It follows logically that MBF is an important determinant of myocardial performance, and it is proposed in this review that cardiac afferent sensory nerves might contribute to controlling and limiting heart rate, hence maximal CO, in order to protect the heart from ischaemia.

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
This review was written during my Academy Research Fellowship, funded by the Research Council of Finland (324243).


Last updated on 2025-05-06 at 07:32