A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Emotional engagement and perceived empathy in live vs. automated psychological interviews
Authors: Nyman, Thomas J.; Noromies, Anna-Karin; Pompedda, Francesco; Santtila, Pekka; Antfolk, Jan
Editors: Khan Iftikhar Ahmed
Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication year: 2025
Journal: PLoS ONE
Journal name in source: PLOS One
Article number: e0323490
Volume: 20
eISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323490
Web address : https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323490
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/491942860
In clinical in-person conditions, social presence, perceived empathy, and emotional engagement are related to positive outcomes. In online settings, it is unclear how these factors affect outcomes. Here, in 10–15-minute interviews, we investigated the influence of automation. Participants (N = 75) engaged in one of three possible interviews: live semi-scripted, live scripted, or video scripted. In the first two, participants communicated with a live interviewer and, in the third, with pre-recorded interviewer questions and answers. Emotion recognition software revealed that expressed joy differed between conditions (χ2(2) = 18.08, p < .001); both live conditions had higher scores (vs. video scripted). Self-rated perceived interviewer empathy also differed between conditions in the same way (F[2, 72] = 9.445, p < 0.001). We found a positive correlation between perceived empathy and expressed joy (r = .35; p < .01). In sum, automatized interviews differed in perceived empathy and expressed emotion compared with live interviews.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Funding information in the publication:
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.