A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Emotional engagement and perceived empathy in live vs. automated psychological interviews




AuthorsNyman, Thomas J.; Noromies, Anna-Karin; Pompedda, Francesco; Santtila, Pekka; Antfolk, Jan

EditorsKhan Iftikhar Ahmed

PublisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)

Publication year2025

JournalPLoS ONE

Journal name in sourcePLOS One

Article numbere0323490

Volume20

eISSN1932-6203

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323490

Web address https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323490

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/491942860


Abstract

In clinical in-person conditions, social presence, perceived empathy, and emotional engagement are related to positive outcomes. In online settings, it is unclear how these factors affect outcomes. Here, in 10–15-minute interviews, we investigated the influence of automation. Participants (N = 75) engaged in one of three possible interviews: live semi-scripted, live scripted, or video scripted. In the first two, participants communicated with a live interviewer and, in the third, with pre-recorded interviewer questions and answers. Emotion recognition software revealed that expressed joy differed between conditions (χ2(2) = 18.08, p < .001); both live conditions had higher scores (vs. video scripted). Self-rated perceived interviewer empathy also differed between conditions in the same way (F[2, 72] = 9.445, p < 0.001). We found a positive correlation between perceived empathy and expressed joy (r = .35; p < .01). In sum, automatized interviews differed in perceived empathy and expressed emotion compared with live interviews.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.


Last updated on 2025-23-05 at 15:04