Expanding interpretability through complexity reduction in machine learning‐based modelling of cardiovascular disease: A myocardial perfusion imaging PET/CT prognostic study




Lehtonen, Eero; Teuho, Jarmo; Vatandoust, Monire; Knuuti, Juhani; Knol, Remco J. J.; van der Zant, Friso M.; Juarez-Orozco, Luis Eduardo; Klen, Riku

Publisher Wiley-Blackwell

HOBOKEN

2025

European Journal of Clinical Investigation

European Journal of Clinical Investigation

EUR J CLIN INVEST

e14391

55

S1

10

0014-2972

1365-2362

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14391

https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14391

https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/491843613



Background

Machine learning-based analysis can be used in myocardial perfusion imaging data to improve risk stratification and the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events for patients with suspected or established coronary artery disease. We present a new machine learning approach for the identification of patients who develop major adverse cardiovascular events. The new method is robust against the deleterious effect of outliers in the training set stratification and training process.

Methods

The proposed sum-of-sigmoids model is obtained by averaging the contributions of various input variables in an ensemble of XGBoost models. To illustrate its performance, we have applied it to predict major adverse cardiovascular events from advanced imaging data extracted from rest and adenosine stress 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging polar maps. There were 1185 individual studies performed, and the event occurrence was tracked over a follow-up period of 2 years.

Results

The sum-of-sigmoids model achieved a prediction accuracy of .83 on the test set, matching the performance of significantly more complex and less interpretable models (whose accuracies were .83–.84).

Conclusion

The sum-of-sigmoids model is interpretable and simple, while achieving similar prediction accuracy to significantly more complex machine learning models in the considered prediction task. It should be suitable for applications such as automated clinical risk stratification, where clear and explicit justification of the classification procedure is highly pertinent.


Authors acknowledge financial support by grants from the Academy of Finland (PI Dr. Juhani Knuuti, Academy Decision Number 351482), the Finnish Cultural Foundation (Maire and Aimo Mäkinen Fund) and the State Research Funding of Turku University Hospital (under grant 30046).


Last updated on 2025-19-05 at 18:35