A2 Refereed review article in a scientific journal

Competence of healthcare professionals performing electroencephalography test: A systematic review




AuthorsLinnavuori, Elina; Virtanen, Irina; Stolt, Minna

PublisherElsevier BV

Publication year2025

JournalClinical neurophysiology practice

Journal name in sourceClinical Neurophysiology Practice

Journal acronymClin Neurophysiol Pract

Volume10

First page 104

Last page115

eISSN2467-981X

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2025.03.001(external)

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2025.03.001(external)

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/491726515(external)


Abstract
Objective

To describe the EEG competence of healthcare professionals and how this competence has been measured in previous literature.

Methods

A systematic review following the preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. A literature search was conducted in CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases focusing on studies that empirically examined the EEG competence of healthcare professionals.

Results

A total of 28 studies were included. EEG competence consists of two main categories: knowledge and skills of EEG, and attitudes and values towards EEG. The EEG competence of healthcare professionals was assessed in three different settings: tests, simulations, and real life. The data collection methods were knowledge tests, self-assessments, and observations. The tools were developed by a researcher(s) for the single study and were not psychometrically tested.

Conclusion

EEG competence is a multidimensional concept that includes knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values that need to be considered when defining EEG competence and developing tools to measure it.

Significance

This systematic review provides information to the educators of healthcare professionals and healthcare organizations involved in developing comprehensive EEG training programs and assessments to foster professional development and ensure reliable diagnostic test results for patients.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
The study was funded by the University of Turku Joint Research Grant Fund (TY/197/2023)


Last updated on 2025-08-05 at 11:06