A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Convergent validity of 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) among people with neck pain




TekijätKarklins, Aleksandra; Berzina, Guna; Saltychev, Mikhail

ToimittajaMahmud Ilias

KustantajaPublic Library of Science (PLoS)

KustannuspaikkaSAN FRANCISCO

Julkaisuvuosi2025

Lehti: PLoS ONE

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiPLOS ONE

Lehden akronyymiPLOS ONE

Artikkelin numeroe0315676

Vuosikerta20

Numero3

Sivujen määrä9

ISSN1932-6203

eISSN1932-6203

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315676

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläAvoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Kokonaan avoin julkaisukanava

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315676

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/491623640


Tiivistelmä

Objective: To explore the convergent validity of 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) comparing it to Neck Disability Index (NDI).

Design: Cross-sectional cohort study.

Subjects/patients: 962 patients visiting a university outpatient Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Clinic due to musculoskeletal complaints.

Methods: Spearman´s rank correlation between WHODAS 2.0 and NDI.

Results: The average age was 49.2 (SD 14.5) years, 67% were women. Of all the possible 143 correlations between WHODAS 2.0 and NDI, 99 (69%) were positive, significant and strong or, at least, moderate. The correlation between the composite scores of two scales was strong. The weakest correlations were seen for the NDI items 'pain intensity and 'headaches'.

Conclusion: Most of the items and the composite scores of the WHODAS and the NDI demonstrated significant positive correlations. Pain intensity, as defined by the NDI, did not correlate with disability severity measured by the WHODAS 2.0. Also, the NDI items 'headaches' and 'sleeping' were associated with the WHODAS 2.0 only loosely. It seems that one of these two scales may not directly be substituted by another. When used simultaneously, The WHODAS and the NDI may complement each other covering comprehensively the different dimensions of functioning among people with neck pain.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
The authors received no specific funding for this work.


Last updated on 2025-30-04 at 13:24