Beyond material recovery: Exergy and environmental analysis of silicon solar panel recycling

: Jech, Šimon; Bartie, Neill; Tas, Gulsah; Miettunen, Kati; Serna-Guerrero, Rodrigo; Santasalo-Aarnio, Annukka

Publisher: Elsevier BV

: AMSTERDAM

: 2025

: Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells

: SOL ENERG MAT SOL C

: 113561

: 286

: 12

: 0927-0248

: 1879-3398

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113561(external)

: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113561(external)

: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/491561389(external)

The recycling of silicon solar panels is vital to ensure critical material recovery and to sustain the manufacturing of new panels in line with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. While various recycling methods based on thermal, chemical, or mechanical separation of the solar panel layers have been studied, a comprehensive thermodynamic and environmental analysis is required to allow holistic comparison within the circular economy framework. Here, such an analysis is performed for four different silicon solar panel recycling processes. First, the processes were simulated in HSC chemistryTM to analyse the flows of exergy. Subsequently, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was conducted to understand the environmental benefits and drawbacks of each method. Combined Exergy-LCA analysis showed that a slightly less exergy-efficient process, namely pyrolysis can ultimately has the lowest environmental impact out of the four processes. In contrast chemical treatment of the encapsulant exhibited comparably worse performance due to its increased resource consumption. On the material level, high-value material recovery, if realized, could be thermodynamically and environmentally advantageous. The recovery methods presented here could be further improved if heat integration or the use of natural solvents would be considered. These unique findings demonstrate that weighing exergy - Life Cycle Analysis trade-offs across different recycling approaches could navigate future developments towards more sustainable solar panel recycling. Therefore, such an approach is recommended over solely focusing on material recovery.

1-s2.0-S092702482500162X-main.pdf

:
S.J., K.M. and A.S.-A. thank Research Council of Finland Project ECOSOL (numbers 347275 and 347276) . S.J. wishes to thank the Aalto University School of Engineering for supporting this research. G.T. and R.S-G. thank the Finnish Natural Resources Research Foundation (Suomen Luonnonvarain Tutkimussaatio) project CircuS for their support. The authors wish to acknowledge the help of Arpad I. Toldy in correcting the language and style of this article.