A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Re-evaluating the importance of protein quality: insights on its limited role in multi-nutrient functional units




AuthorsTukiainen, Kerttu; Kyttä, Venla; Gómez-Gallego, Carlos; Kolehmainen, Marjukka; Pajari, Anne-Maria; Tuomisto, Hanna L.; Saarinen, Merja; Kårlund, Anna

PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC

Publishing placeHEIDELBERG

Publication year2025

JournalInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Journal name in sourceThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Journal acronymINT J LIFE CYCLE ASS

Number of pages11

ISSN0948-3349

eISSN1614-7502

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-025-02451-w

Web address https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-025-02451-w

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/491505988


Abstract

Purpose

Changes in the consumption of protein-rich foods are needed due to their high environmental impacts. However, proteins are indispensable for human nutrition, and there is notable variation in the protein quality of protein-rich foods. The methods to consider protein quality in Nutritional Life Cycle Assessment (nLCA) are still developing. In this study, we assessed the impact of including protein quality in single- and multi-nutrient nutritional functional units (nFUs) in an LCA of products and meals.

Methods

We conducted an LCA with four different nFUs: protein content, protein content adjusted for protein quality, nutrient index for protein-rich foods, and the same nutrient index adjusted for protein quality. To assess the protein quality of the food products Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS) was used. The assessed food products were patties with beef, pork, chicken, trout, perch, chickpea, and soymeal as the main ingredients. The assessments were also done at meal-level, including a side dish of potatoes and mixed salad.

Results and discussion

Animal-based foods were of higher protein quality. When protein quality was included in the single-nutrient nFU, i.e. protein content, in nLCA, the climate impact decreased for animal-based products and increased for plant-based products. At meal-level, the trend was similar; however, the overall protein quality of meals was lower in comparison to the patties. When including protein quality correction in the nutrient index, there were little to no changes in the index score, resulting in little to no difference in the climate impact.

Conclusions

Protein-rich foods vary in protein quality, and thus, adjusting protein content with protein quality in nLCAs might be of interest when assessing only one nutrient, i.e. protein. However, we recommend it as an additional measure as there are notable limitations in assessing protein quality. Instead, when assessing multiple nutrients, as in nutrient indices, adding digestibility of protein into the index might not bring additional value to nLCA.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
Open access funding provided by Natural Resources Institute Finland. This work has been done as part of Integrating nutritional quality into environmental impact assessment and communication—a product group approach—project funded by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (the Development Fund for Agriculture and Forestry) and the stakeholder companies Atria Oyj, Helsingin Mylly Oy, Kesko Oyj, Oy, Karl Fazer Ab, Oy Soya Ab, Vaasan Oy, and Valio Oy. These companies had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit this manuscript for publication.


Last updated on 2025-22-04 at 07:58