A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Perspectives of nurses and patient representatives on the morally competent nurse: An international focus group study




AuthorsGastmans, Chris; Mertens, Evelyne; Palese, Alvisa; Keogh, Brian; Apolloni, Francesca; Wiisak, Johanna; Cabe, Catherine Mc; Dimitriadou, Maria; Galazzi, Alessandro; Igoumenidis, Michael; Stefanopoulos, Nikos; Charitou, Paraskevi; Papastavrou, Evridiki; Suhonen, Riitta; Chiappinotto, Stefania; Promocon Consortium

PublisherElsevier BV

Publication year2025

JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies Advances

Journal name in sourceInternational Journal of Nursing Studies Advances

Article number100296

Volume8

First page 100296

eISSN2666-142X

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100296

Web address https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100296

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/491246522


Abstract

Background: Across the world, healthcare systems have become increasingly complex, making it more difficult for nurses to act ethically when faced with moral dilemmas. The COVID-19 pandemic in particular revealed ethical challenges, highlighting the need for nurses to attain high levels of moral competence. Nurses who attain moral competency provide superior patient care because they have integrated clinical competence with sensitivity to moral values. Understanding what comprises moral competence in nursing is crucial to stimulate and support consistent ethical behaviour. However, most studies to date on moral competence in nursing have been conducted at a national level and only from a particular stakeholders’ perspective, thereby limiting their utility.
Objective: To explore and document the characteristics of the morally competent nurse from the perspectives of nurses and patient representatives practicing in Europe.
Design: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted.
Methods: Semi-structured focus group discussions were conducted to collect data. Data were analysed with a descriptive thematic method.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
Funding was provided by the Erasmus + programme of the European Union (agreement no. 2022–1-IT02-KA220-HED000087544). The European Commission’s support to produce this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents, which reflect the views only of the authors. Thus, the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use of the information contained therein.


Last updated on 2025-01-04 at 13:21