A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Medical Students’ Specialty Preference Relative to Trait Emotional Intelligence and General Self-Efficacy
Tekijät: Michael El Boghdady, Béatrice Marianne Ewalds-Kvist, Kimberly Duffy, Ahmed Hassane, Omar Kouli, Ben Ward, Bin-Hui Yap, Anna Crawford, Chung-Sien Chai, Jia-Ying Lim, Natalia Makhdoom
Kustantaja: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia
Julkaisuvuosi: 2020
Journal: Education in Medicine Journal
Lehden akronyymi: EIMJ
Vuosikerta: 12
Numero: 2
Aloitussivu: 23
Lopetussivu: 35
eISSN: 2180-1932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2020.12.2.3
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/48969160
Medical students’ specialty preference (SP) for future areas of expertise in the context of their profession has always been in focus of interest. The purpose of this study was fourfold: (i) To disclose medical students’ SP; (ii) To reveal SP’s underlying extrinsic, intrinsic or dual motivations; (iii) To assess medical students’ trait emotional intelligence (EI), and general sense of perceived self-efcacy (GSE); (iv) To observe gender differences in SP choice. 93% out of 318 medical students completed questionnaires comprising 13 SP hints and student’s underlying motivation for SP. By Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire–Short Form and General Self-Efcacy Scale, students’ personality characteristics were self-rated. By principal component analysis, the components ‘working situation’ (reecting extrinsic motivation), ‘specialty prospect’ (suggesting intrinsic motivation) and ‘Career Opportunity’ (indicating dual motivation) were scrutinised. Students scoring high on trait EI and GSE were analysed separately. Male students prioritised surgical specialties (26%); female students preferred general practice (13.7%). Female students exhibited intrinsic motivation in Specialty Prospect; male students displayed extrinsic motivation in Career Opportunities. High trait EI-scoring male students surpassed high-scoring female students; high GSE-scoring male students exceeded high-scoring female students; also, in the total sum GSE as opposed to total sum of trait EI scores, where no gender difference emerged. Components specialty prospect and career opportunity related to students’ trait EI and GSE. Family characteristics linked to students’ trait EI and GSE along with their SP choice. In conclusion, male students prioritised surgical specialties as opposed to female students, who preferred general practice. The underlying motivation attracting a student to SP was revealed. Female students were intrinsically motivated, more so than male students, who displayed extrinsic ambition. High trait EI-scoring male students surpassed high-scoring female students, but no gender difference was found in total EI sum. High GSE-scoring male students exceeded high-scoring female students, also in total GSE sum. Trait EI and GSE were non-interchangeable but complementary measures informative in medical education.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
