A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Arvi Grotenfelt and neo-Kantian philosophy of history
Tekijät: Lauri Kallio
Kustantaja: CONSEJO SUPERIOR INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS-CSIC, INST FILOSOFIA
Julkaisuvuosi: 2020
Journal: Con-Textos Kantianos International Journal of Philosophy
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: CON-TEXTOS KANTIANOS-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY
Lehden akronyymi: CON-TEXTOS KANTIANOS
Numero: 11
Aloitussivu: 336
Lopetussivu: 351
Sivujen määrä: 16
ISSN: 2386-7655
eISSN: 2386-7655
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3864911
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/48698110
The paper discusses Arvi Grotenfelt's (1863-1941), professor of philosophy in Helsinki 1905-29, reading of Heinrich Rickert's (1863-1936) philosophy of history. Rickert was one of the key figures of the so-called south-west German neo-Kantianism. In the center of attention of the southwest neo-Kantians was the topic that Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) himself had omitted: how to philosophically establish the humanities and the social sciences and separate them from the natural sciences? Rickert's philosophy of history was essentially an attempt to ground the historical knowledge in a strictly transcendental philosophy in the Kantian sense. His argumentation relied on his concept of value (Wert). Grotenfelt did not share Rickert's definition of values. According to his view, the fundamental foundation of our judgements of value is beyond scientific reasoning. I will also argue that Grotenfelt's standpoint has a general affinity to Wilhelm Dilthey's (1833-1911) philosophy of world view (Weltanschauung).
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
