A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Methods for estimating full width at half maximum
Authors: Rainio, Oona; Hällilä, Johanna; Teuho, Jarmo; Klén, Riku
Publisher: SPRINGER LONDON LTD
Publishing place: LONDON
Publication year: 2025
Journal: Signal, Image and Video Processing
Journal name in source: SIGNAL IMAGE AND VIDEO PROCESSING
Journal acronym: SIGNAL IMAGE VIDEO P
Article number: 289
Volume: 19
Issue: 4
Number of pages: 7
ISSN: 1863-1703
eISSN: 1863-1711
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-025-03820-6
Web address : https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11760-025-03820-6
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/485161689
Background: Measurement of full width at half maximum (FWHM) is used in multiple important applications related to the evaluation of the image resolution and the performance assessment of different scanner devices especially in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, but little research has been performed about different methods for estimating FWHM.
Materials and methods: We study seven different methods for estimating FWHM, including measuring FWHM according to its definition, four methods based on estimation of the standard deviation, the standard method of National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA), and a new method utilizing an optimization algorithm to fit a Gaussian curve to the data. We compare their performance with several simulations. We also apply these techniques on two real data sets created by PET images of an 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose resolution phantom imaged with High Resolution Research Tomograph concept camera and Biograph Vision Quadra and a sodium-22 point source imaged with RAYCAN X5 PET/CT system.
Results and conclusion: According to our results from both simulated and real data, the most accurate methods are the first method based on the definition of FWHM and the NEMA standard method. In particular, both of these methods work in a reliable way in real data experiments, even when there is a very limited number of points available for FWHM computation.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Funding information in the publication:
Open Access funding provided by University of Turku (including Turku University Central Hospital). The first author was financially supported by the Finnish Culture Foundation. This study was supported through funding from State Research Funding (the expert responsibility area (ERVA) of Turku University Hospital), by the clinical EVO Grant admitted by Turku PET Centre (Project Number: 13720).