A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Lesion delivery and scar formation in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: The DECAAF II trial
Tekijät: Akoum, N; Mekhael, M; Bisbal, F; Wazni, O; McGann, C; Lee, H; Bardsley, T; Greene, T; Dean, JM; Dagher, L; Kholmovski, E; Mansour, M; Marchlinski, F; Wilber, D; Hindricks, G; Mahnkopf, C; Wells, D; Jaïs, P; Sanders, P; Brachmann, J; Bax, JJ; Morrison-de Boer, L; Deneke, T; Calkins, H; Sohns, C; Marrouche, N; DECAAF II investigators
Julkaisuvuosi: 2024
Journal: Heart Rhythm
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: Heart rhythm
Lehden akronyymi: Heart Rhythm
ISSN: 1547-5271
eISSN: 1556-3871
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.08.062
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.08.062
Background: The Efficacy of Delayed Enhancement MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation randomized trial showed no difference in atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence with additional delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) fibrosis-targeted ablation to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in persistent AF.
Objective: We evaluated the effect of lesion delivery on ablation-induced scarring and AF recurrence.
Methods: Lesions delivered, targeting fibrotic and nonfibrotic areas identified from preablation DE-MRI, were studied in relation to ablation-induced scarring on 3-month DE-MRI, including their association with arrhythmia recurrence.
Results: A total of 593 patients treated with radiofrequency were analyzed: 293 (49.4%) underwent PVI and 300 (50.6%) underwent additional fibrosis-guided ablation. Lesion analysis showed that 80.9% in the MRI fibrosis-guided group vs 16.5% in the PVI group (P < .001) had ≥40% of baseline fibrosis targeted. MRI assessment of ablation-induced scar showed that 44.8% of fibrosis-guided ablation and 15.5% of PVI had ≥40% of their fibrosis covered by scar (P < .001), demonstrating significant attenuation from lesions delivered to scar formed. In the overall population, fibrosis coverage with scar was not associated with recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-1.01; P = .08 per 20% increase). In patients with baseline fibrosis < 20%, fibrosis coverage with scar was associated with lower recurrence than PVI (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73-0.97; P = .03), whereas the association was not significant when baseline fibrosis ≥ 20% (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.80-1.17; P = .77). Significant center variation was observed in fibrosis targeting and coverage with scarring.
Conclusion: Radiofrequency ablation lesions do not uniformly result in scar formation. A post hoc analysis suggests reduced arrhythmia recurrence when ablation-induced scarring covers fibrotic regions in patients with low baseline fibrosis.