A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy procedure volume trends, perioperative mortality, and malpractice claims : Population-based analysis




AuthorsNurminen, Nelli; Järvinen, Tommi, Robinson, Eric; Zhou, Nanruoyi; Salo, Silja; Räsänen, Jari; Kytö, Ville; Ilonen, Ilkka

PublisherThieme

Publication year2024

JournalEndoscopy international open

Journal name in sourceEndoscopy international open

Journal acronymEndosc Int Open

Volume12

Issue3

First page E385

Last pageE393

ISSN2196-9736

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1055/a-2265-8757

Web address https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/a-2265-8757

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/484791645


Abstract

Background and study aims Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (EGD) is one of the most common diagnostic procedures done to examine the foregut, but it can also be used for therapeutic interventions. The main objectives of this study were to investigate trends in EGD utilization and mortality related to it in a national low-threshold healthcare system, assess perioperative safety, and identify and describe patient-reported malpractice claims from the national database.

Patients and methods We retrospectively identified patients from the Finnish Patient Care Registry who underwent diagnostic or procedural EGD between 2010 and 2018. In addition, patient-reported claims for malpractice were analyzed from the National Patient Insurance Center (PIC) database. Patient survival data were gathered collectively from the National Death Registry from Statistics Finland.

Results During the study period, 409,153 EGDs were performed in Finland for 298,082 patients, with an annual rate of 9.30 procedures per 1,000 inhabitants, with an annual increase of 2.6%. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 1.70% and 90-day mortality was 3.84%. For every 1,000 patients treated, 0.23 malpractice claims were filed.

Conclusions The annual rate of EGD increased by 2.6% during the study, while the rate of interventional procedures remained constant. Also, while the 30-day mortality rate declined over the study period, it is an unsuitable quality metric for EGDs in comprehensive centers because a patient's underlying disease plays a larger role than the procedure in perioperative mortality. Finally, there were few malpractice claims, with self-evident causes prevailing.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
Helsinki University Hospital Y242SK2312


Last updated on 2025-21-02 at 13:20