A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Posterior approach, fracture diagnosis, and American Society of Anesthesiology class III-IV are associated with increased risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of 33,337 operations from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register




AuthorsV. J. Panula , E. M. Ekman , M. S. Venäläinen, I. Laaksonen, R. Klén, J. J. Haapakoski, A. P. Eskelinen, L. L. Elo, Keijo T. Mäkelä

PublisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD

Publication year2020

JournalScandinavian Journal of Surgery

Journal name in sourceSCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY

Journal acronymSCAND J SURG

Article number1457496920930617

Number of pages8

ISSN1457-4969

eISSN1799-7267

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1457496920930617

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/48473214


Abstract
Background and Aims:Dislocation is one of the most common reasons for revision surgery after primary total hip arthroplasty. Both patient related and surgical factors may influence the risk of dislocation. In this study, we evaluated risk factors for dislocation revision after total hip arthroplasty based on revised data contents of the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.Materials and

Methods:We analyzed 33,337 primary total hip arthroplasties performed between May 2014 and January 2018 in Finland. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for first dislocation revision using 18 potential risk factors as covariates, such as age, sex, diagnosis, hospital volume, surgical approach, head size, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiology class, and fixation method.
Results:During the study period, there were 264 first-time revisions for dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. The hazard ratio for dislocation revision was 3.1 (confidence interval 1.7-5.5) for posterior compared to anterolateral approach, 3.0 (confidence interval 1.9-4.7) for total hip arthroplasties performed for femoral neck fracture compared to total hip arthroplasties performed for osteoarthritis, 2.0 (confidence interval 1.0-3.9) for American Society of Anesthesiology class III-IV compared to American Society of Anesthesiology class I, and 0.5 (0.4-0.7) for 36-mm femoral head size compared to 32-mm head size.
Conclusion:Special attention should be paid to patients with fracture diagnoses and American Society of Anesthesiology class III-IV. Anterolateral approach and 36-mm femoral heads decrease dislocation revision risk and should be considered for high-risk patients.

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 14:24