A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Diagnostic and prognostic performance of urine ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 across multiple acute brain injury types – A longitudinal prospective cohort study
Authors: Hellström, Santtu; Sajanti, Antti; Jhaveri, Aditya; Srinath, Abhinav; Bennett, Carolyn; Cao, Ying; Koskimäki, Fredrika; Falter, Johannes; Frantzén, Janek; Lyne, Seán B.; Rantamäki, Tomi; Takala, Riikka; Posti, Jussi P.; Roine, Susanna; Kolehmainen, Sulo; Jänkälä, Miro; Puolitaival, Jukka; Girard, Romuald; Rahi, Melissa; Rinne, Jaakko; Castrén, Eero; Koskimäki, Janne
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Publication year: 2025
Journal: Brain and Spine
Journal name in source: Brain and Spine
Article number: 104173
Volume: 5
ISSN: 2772-5294
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2024.104173
Web address : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2024.104173
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/484678557
Introduction: Ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) is recognized as a diagnostic and prognostic blood biomarker for traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aimed to evaluate whether UCH-L1 concentrations measured in patients' urine post-injury could serve as a diagnostic or prognostic biomarker for outcomes in various types of acute brain injuries (ABI).
Material and methods: This pilot study included 46 ABI patients: aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 22), ischemic stroke (n = 16), and traumatic brain injury (n = 8), along with three healthy controls. Urine samples were collected at early (1.50 ± 0.70 days) and late (9.17 ± 3.40 days) periods post-admission. UCH-L1 and creatinine levels were quantified using ELISA. UCH-L1 concentrations were compared to functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale, mRS) and dichotomized into favorable (mRS 0–3) and unfavorable (mRS 4–6) groups. Non-parametric statistical tests and ROC analysis was performed.
Results: UCH-L1 concentrations in healthy controls were significantly lower compared to both early and late samples after ABI (p ≤ 0.001). The diagnostic performance of urine UCH-L1 at early timepoint showed excellent discriminatory ability, with AUC of 97.6% (95% CI: 93.0–100, p = 0.006 (sensitivity 98%, specificity 100%). Urine UCH-L1 concentrations, both with and without creatinine normalization, did not distinguish between favorable and unfavorable outcomes in either early (p = 0.88 and p = 0.36) or late samples (p = 0.98 and p = 0.30) in any types of ABI.
Discussion and conclusions: Although UCH-L1 concentrations in urine did not differentiate between favorable and unfavorable outcomes, a significant difference was observed between healthy subjects and ABI patients. This finding underscores the significant diagnostic utility of urine UCH-L1 concentrations, regardless of the type of acute brain injury.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Funding information in the publication:
Funding was received for this work by JK from the Sigrid Juselius Foundation and the Finnish Medical Foundation. AS received funding from the Sigrid Juselius Foundation and the Maire Taponen Foundation. SH received funding from the Sigrid Juselius Foundation. JPP received funding from the Research Council of Finland (grant 60063).