A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Provenance studies of Au-bearing stream sediments and performance assessment of machine learning-based models: insight from whole-rock geochemistry central Tanzania, East Africa




TekijätAbu, Mahamuda; Mvile, Benatus Norbert; Kalimenze, John Desderius

KustantajaSPRINGER

KustannuspaikkaNEW YORK

Julkaisuvuosi2024

JournalEnvironmental Earth Sciences

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES

Lehden akronyymiENVIRON EARTH SCI

Artikkelin numero 105

Vuosikerta83

Numero3

Sivujen määrä16

ISSN1866-6280

eISSN1866-6299

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11419-2

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11419-2


Tiivistelmä
The source of clastic sediments generally, can be traced to their source through provenance studies using the whole rock geochemistry of clastic sediments. However, the provenance of the Au-bearing stream sediments within the central parts of Tanzania is yet to be deciphered. Hence, in this study, to enhance exploration targeting, the source of the Au-bearing stream sediments was characterized using whole-rock geochemistry. The performance of linear regression (LR), decision tree (DT), and polynomial regression (PR) models as prediction models for the Au mineralization in the area, were also compared as additional Au exploration techniques worth exploring in the area. The weathering condition proxies, CIA, ICV, CIW, and PIA as well as discriminant diagrams suggest weakly to intensely weathered sediments. The values of SiO2/Al2O3 and K2O/Al2O3 are indicative of felsic source rocks rather than compositional maturity due to sediments reworking. From Th/Cr, Cr/Th, Th/U, La/Sc, and Th/Sc proxies, the Au-bearing stream sediments are sourced from felsic igneous rocks. These indications are corroborated by the correlation matrix assessment. However, Au is not sourced from the same source rocks as the host sediments due probably, to a prior depositional mixing of the sediments before subsequent transportation to their current depositional environment. With R2 (0.62), MAE (0.6035), MSE (0.6546), and RMSE (0.8091) for LR, R2 (1.0), MAE (0.7500), MSE (1.6273), and RMSE (1.2752) for DT, and R2 (1.0), MAE (2.6608), MSE (12.7840), and RMSE (3.5755), for PR. The LR model performs better in predicting the Au occurrence in the area.



Last updated on 2025-03-02 at 08:22