A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

COVID-19 infection and later risk of sickness absence by socioeconomic status: a cohort study




AuthorsJoensuu, Matti; Kausto, Johanna; Airaksinen, Jaakko; Oksanen, Tuula; Vahtera, Jussi; Kivimäki, Mika; Ervasti, Jenni

PublisherBMC

Publishing placeLONDON

Publication year2024

JournalBMC Public Health

Journal name in sourceBMC PUBLIC HEALTH

Journal acronymBMC PUBLIC HEALTH

Article number3622

Volume24

Issue1

Number of pages9

eISSN1471-2458

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-21148-7

Web address https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-21148-7

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/478088972


Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic was a significant health risk and resulted in increased sickness absence during the pandemic. This study examines whether a history of COVID-19 infection is associated with a higher risk of subsequent sickness absence.

Methods In this prospective cohort study, 32,124 public sector employees responded to a survey on COVID-19 infection and lifestyle factors in 2020 and were linked to sickness absence records before (2019) and after (2021-2022) the survey. Study outcome was annual sickness absence defined as the total number of sickness absence days and the number of short sickness absence spells (< 10 days) and long sickness absence spells (10-365 days). We used negative binomial regression adjusting for sex, age, employment characteristics, body mass index, health behaviors in 2020 and sickness absence in 2019. We examined differences in sickness absence between socioeconomic statuses (SES), measured by occupational titles from employers' records.

Results A self-reported COVID-19 infection in 2020 was associated with higher subsequent risk of sickness absence in 2021: Adjusted Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) compared to those not reporting COVID-19 was 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.37 for sickness absence days, 1.29, 1.20-1.38 for short sickness absence spells and 1.20, 1.04-1.37 for long spells. The association was strongest in employees with intermediate SES: 1.45, 1.20-1.77 days, 1.42, 1.26-1.61 short spells, and 1.30, 1.03-1.64 long spells. For employees with low and high SES, an association was observed only for short spells.

Conclusions Employees who reported contracting first-wave COVID-19 infection had higher rates of sickness absence in the following year. This excess risk was most consistently observed in employees with intermediate socioeconomic status (e.g. office workers, registered nurses, and social workers).


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
MJ, JK, JA, MK and JE were supported by the Finnish Work Environment Fund (#220431).


Last updated on 2025-27-01 at 19:34