A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Rage, revenge, reward, and recreation: Validating short-form measures of adolescents' aggression across offline and online contexts
Tekijät: Graf, Daniel; Yanagida, Takuya
Kustantaja: SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
Kustannuspaikka: LONDON
Julkaisuvuosi: 2024
Journal: International Journal of Behavioral Development
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT
Lehden akronyymi: INT J BEHAV DEV
Sivujen määrä: 8
ISSN: 0165-0254
eISSN: 1464-0651
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254241306113
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1177/016502542413061
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/478084968
The quadripartite violence typology categorizes aggression into rage, revenge, reward, and recreational aggression. Furthermore, the general aggression model highlights the interaction between personal and contextual factors in shaping aggressive behavior. Whereas the four types of aggression are considered as personal factors, a contextual distinction can be made between offline and online contexts. To date, only the Cyber-Aggression Typology Questionnaire (CATQ) and its offline counterpart, the Face-to-Face Aggression Typology Questionnaire (FATQ), operationalize each aggression type specifically for offline and online settings. However, this questionnaire set presents limitations in its applicability due to its item count and exclusive validation in university students. In this two-study article, we developed and validated short versions (CATQ-S/FATQ-S) utilizing Graf et al.'s original dataset (N = 587 university students, Study 1) and revalidated them in a new sample of secondary school students (N = 1,064, Study 2). In Study 1, structural validity of the CATQ-S/FATQ-S could be confirmed. All scales of the CATQ-S showed acceptable to good reliabilities. Whereas the revenge and recreational aggression scales of the FATQ-S showed acceptable to good reliabilities, the reliabilities of its rage and reward scales were slightly below the threshold of .70. All short scales showed substantial correlations with their corresponding full scales. Similar correlational patterns for the short and full scales with external criteria could be found. In Study 2, structural validity of the CATQ-S/FATQ-S could be confirmed. All scales of the CATQ-S/FATQ-S showed acceptable to good reliabilities and criterion validity was largely observed. This research supports the four-factor model of aggression in both offline and online contexts and provides a practical instrument designed for the efficient measurement of four-factor aggression in secondary schools.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by the INVEST Research Flagship Centre, funded by the Research Council of Finland (Decision Number: 345546), and the Challenge Project (ERC-AdG 2019: 884434; awarded to Prof. Christina Salmivalli). Open Access funding was provided by the University of Turku, including Turku University Central Hospital.
