A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Identifying prominent actors in historical networks: The case of the New Education movement




AuthorsLuoto, Lauri

PublisherROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD

Publishing placeABINGDON

Publication year2025

JournalHistorical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History

Journal name in sourceHISTORICAL METHODS

Journal acronymHIST METHOD

Volume58

Issue1

First page 17

Last page30

Number of pages14

ISSN0161-5440

eISSN1940-1906

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/01615440.2024.2431487

Web address https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01615440.2024.2431487

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/477929415


Abstract
Social network analysis is becoming increasingly popular for studying the past. However, during the last decades, studies have applied pre-collected datasets for social network analysis, which limits the use of the method to cases where such data is available. This article presents another approach whereby two-mode network data are collected from less structured documentary sources, and the findings are enriched with documentary evidence. The approach is used to analyze how 42 notable members of the British New Education movement between 1905 and 1935 were affiliated with 31 organizations. The analysis provides empirical support for the previously proposed idea that there were two kinds of prominence within the movement: that of conveners, who formed close-knit groups with like-minded people, and that of mediators, who built bridges between such groups. Moreover, we discuss how this structure helped the movement to achieve its goals of more up-to-date, equally available education. The method presented in the article is suitable for researchers working with bibliographical or archive material in various domains.

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
No funding was involved in this article.


Last updated on 2025-27-03 at 11:39