A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Are competent citizens critical democrats? Political resources and evaluations of democratic institutions




AuthorsGoenaga, Agustín; Hansen, Michael A.

PublisherTaylor & Francis Group

Publication year2024

JournalSocial Science Journal

ISSN0362-3319

eISSN1873-5355

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2024.2432190

Web address https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2024.2432190

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/477139231


Abstract

This article examines how cognitive resources such as internal efficacy and political knowledge relate to citizens’ ability to evaluate democratic institutions. Using original survey data from the United States (N = 1093), we find, first, that internal efficacy is associated with more positive assessments of democratic institutions in general. Conversely, political knowledge is associated with more discriminating assessments of specific institutions. Third, political knowledge moderates the positive impact of internal efficacy. Finally, while partisan and ideological reasoning are present in citizens’ evaluations of democracy, greater political knowledge is associated with more nuanced assessments of democratic institutions across parties and ideological orientations. These results suggest that increasing cognitive resources can contribute to the development of critical citizens capable of identifying undemocratic features of their political systems.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Funding information in the publication
Goenaga acknowledges funding from a “Society’s Big Questions” Research Fellowship from the Swedish Academy of Letters, History and Antiquities.


Last updated on 2025-27-01 at 19:44