Advancing methods for comparative nutritional LCA of milk and plant-based milk substitutes




Kovanen, Immi; Kyttä, Venla; Kårlund, Anna; Pajari, Anne-Maria; Tuomisto, Hanna; Saarinen, Merja; Kolehmainen, Marjukka

PublisherSPRINGER HEIDELBERG

HEIDELBERG

2024

International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT

INT J LIFE CYCLE ASS

15

0948-3349

1614-7502

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02407-6

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02407-6

https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/477117978



Purpose

The contribution of milk on the environmental and nutritional impacts of diets is substantial especially in countries with high consumption rates of dairy products, such as in the Nordic countries. Due to environmental and health reasons, plant-based drinks (PBDs) are gaining popularity among consumers, but the nutritional composition of PBDs varies depending on their base ingredients and possible fortification. This study develops product group-specific nutrient indices to be used as functional units (nFU) in life cycle assessments (LCA) of milks and PBDs.

Methods

Here, we formed three product group-specific nutrient indices for milk and PBDs: (i) based on our previous development of product group-specific indices considering the current dietary role of milk in Finnish diets, (ii) based on the potential nutritional benefits of PBDs compared to milk, and (iii) as combination of the two abovementioned indices. The new indices were then applied as a nFUs in a case study comparing selection of 46 drinks from the Finnish food composition database including milks and fortified and unfortified PBDs. The environmental impacts were assessed in five different impact categories utilizing data from LCA databases.

Results and discussion

The index based on current consumption led to the highest nutrient index scores for cow's milks and consequently lower environmental impacts when used as a nFU, whereas the index based on nutrients obtained from PBDs as nFU led to higher environmental impacts for milk and lower for PBDs. Cow's milk had the highest climate impact when the impacts were allocated per unit of mass, but in nFU-based comparison, some PBDs had higher impacts than cow's milk. The results showed notable difference between fortified and unfortified PBDs, as the environmental impacts of unfortified PBDs were higher than impacts of milk when the comparison was based on nutrient content, while the environmental impacts of fortified drinks were lower than those of milk.

Conclusions

The index based on nutrients currently obtained from milk is the most suitable one for capturing the nutritional consequences of substituting milk with PBDs in the current diets. However, the other indices can bring additional information on the possible nutritional benefits in another decision-making situation. As nutrient fortification has substantial impact on the results, the role of fortification in sustainable foods should be further evaluated and the methodological approaches to consider fortification in nLCA advanced.


Open access funding provided by Natural Resources Institute Finland. This work has been done as part of integrating nutritional quality into environmental impact assessment and communication—a product group approach—project funded by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (the Development Fund for Agriculture and Forestry) and the stakeholder companies Atria Oyj, Helsingin Mylly Oy, Kesko Oyj, Oy, Karl Fazer Ab, Oy Soya Ab, Vaasan Oy, and Valio Oy.


Last updated on 2025-27-01 at 19:32