A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Online training to improve evidence-based leadership competencies among nurse leaders in China : a feasibility randomised controlled trial




TekijätHu, Shuang; Chen, Wenjun; Satamo, Maija; Löyttyniemi, Eliisa; Yang, Min; Liu, Gaoming; Chen, Jiarui; Tang, Yao; Varpula, Jaakko; Li, Xianhong; Välimäki, Maritta

KustantajaBMJ

Julkaisuvuosi2024

JournalBMJ Open

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiBMJ Open

Artikkelin numeroe088386

Vuosikerta14

eISSN2044-6055

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088386

Verkko-osoitehttp://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088386

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/470987767


Tiivistelmä

Objective To evaluate the feasibility of an online evidence-based leadership training programme for nurse leaders and its potential effectiveness in improving nurse leaders’ evidence-based leadership competencies.

Design This is a two-arm, parallel, feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Methods We screened all 160 nurse leaders from two Chinese hospitals. Eligible participants who gave their informed consent were randomly assigned to either an evidence-based leadership training group or a conventional online training group at each site and received a 7-month intervention. Pre-test and post-test assessments gauged feasibility and potential effectiveness. Descriptive and inferential statistics were employed for data analysis.

Results Of the 160 screened participants, 119 (74%) were assigned to the intervention group (n=59, 50%) or active control group (n=60, 50%). In the intervention group, the number of participant logins in the modules ranged from 21 (36%) to 58 (98%), while in the control group, it ranged from 20 (33%) to 57 (95%). Participants in the intervention group (n=59) completed 42% of the 531 assigned tasks, while the control group (n=60) completed 41% of their 540 assigned tasks. Regarding course task adherence, participants in the intervention group returned 3.8 (SD=3.2) tasks (out of 9 tasks), while the control group returned 3.7 (SD=3.5) tasks (out of 9 tasks). A total of 22 (18%) out of 119 participants dropped out of the study, with 9 (15%) out of 59 from the intervention group and 13 (22%) out of 60 from the control group.

Conclusions While the intervention demonstrated a degree of feasibility, measures can still be taken to improve intervention acceptability, course adherence and course task adherence. A full and powered randomised controlled trial is needed to test the intervention’s effectiveness and to ensure the feasibility of the study in clinical settings.

Trail registration number ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT05244499.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
The study was supported by the Finnish National Agency of Education, Asia Programme (grant number 26/270/2020) and the University of Turku (internal fund 26003424), Central South University (2023ZZTS0836) and China Scholarship Council (Grant no: NA). The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, review or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.


Last updated on 2025-27-01 at 19:19