In this article, Niko Hatakka
presents the idea that the hybridization of the media system affects
populism as a political logic to the point that it makes it less likely
to constitute a corrective for democracy. This is the case because, even
though populist movements do not have to be anti-pluralist or illiberal, the hybrid media system will make them appear like they are. As he claims in his book, media systems of the 21st century are hybrid:
the access to the public sphere has become more inclusive and
horizontal, allowing more people to get involved in defining how we
should view the world. But what does it mean for the
articulation of “the people” when anybody can speak or be perceived to
speak in the name of “the people”?