B1 Non-refereed article in a scientific journal

A pragmatist defence of rationalism: Towards a cognitive frames-based methodology in International Relations




AuthorsBenjamin Klasche, Peeter Selg

PublisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD

Publication year2020

JournalInternational Relations

Journal name in sourceINTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Journal acronymINT RELAT

Article number0047117820912519

Number of pages21

ISSN0047-1178

eISSN1741-2862

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0047117820912519(external)

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/46963237(external)


Abstract
The endeavour to explain and predict international affairs is getting harder since it is ever more widely accepted that heterogeneous and fluid actors are making international politics. Positivists of various types have dominated the discussion on knowledge creation in the discipline of International Relations (IR), but the increasing acceptance of the dynamic character of international politics has led to the support and use of constructivist, post-Western or feminist approaches. There has also been an uptick in methodological discussions on these critical, non-positivist approaches. This article contributes to these debates by offering the first steps towards a cognitive frames-based methodology for IR. With a pragmatist ontology as its foundation, the approach re-sets the focus of analysis to the rationality of the international actors. The article, offers an initial description, by relying on illustrative examples, of the creation, the reach, durability and the organisational structure of cognitive frames in the global arena.

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 21:03