A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä 
Forms and varieties of research and industry collaboration across disciplines
Tekijät: Annu Kotiranta, Antti Tahvanainen, Anne Kovalainen, Seppo Poutanen
Kustantaja: Elsevier
Julkaisuvuosi: 2020
Lehti:Heliyon
Vuosikerta: 6
Numero: 3
Sivujen määrä: 18
ISSN: 2405-8440
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03404
Verkko-osoite: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844020302498
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/46672157
Academic scientists' engagement with industry is a central mechanism in 
university-industry knowledge transfer and the development of 
collaborative research. However, most empirical studies are limited to 
researchers in technical disciplines. We extend the analysis beyond 
engineers to include broader disciplinary fields, including humanists, 
economists, medicine, biosciences and cross-disciplinary scientists. Our
 findings suggest that cross-disciplinary researchers and researchers in
 technical sciences engage in more industry interaction than their 
peers. The motivations for the choice of research area play an important
 role in industry collaboration. Furthermore, we identify three types of
 industry interaction (interaction modes) among researchers: 1. 
educational interaction, consisting of conferences or seminars, 
corporate training programs, or supervising thesis work; 2. research 
interaction, consisting of shared publications, research-related 
consulting, public research programs and contract research; 3. 
integrated interaction, consisting of joint research in shared 
premisesand employment contracts with companies. Of these, the educational and research interaction modes (1 and 2) are 
motivated by the possibility of individual academic advancement. 
Integrated interaction (3) is rare and significantly correlates with 
only one of the three types of industry cooperation motivations: 
commercialization of research findings. We conclude by identifying 
future research needs, opportunities for methodological improvement and 
policy interventions.
Ladattava julkaisu  This is an electronic reprint of the original article.  |