A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Assessment of CAD-CAM polymers for digitally fabricated complete dentures




AuthorsPerea-Lowery L., Minja I.K., Lassila L., Ramakrishnaiah R., Vallittu P.K.

PublisherMosby Inc.

Publication year2021

JournalJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Journal name in sourceJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volume125

Issue1

First page 175

Last page181

ISSN0022-3913

eISSN1097-6841

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.008

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/46139586


Abstract
Statement of problem

Information on the mechanical properties of the materials used for manufacturing computer-engineered complete dentures is scarce.

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of 3 prepolymerized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resins used in the fabrication of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) milled complete dentures (CDs), as well as 2 denture base polymers used for conventionally fabricated CDs.

Material and methods

Three CAD-CAM materials were evaluated: Degos Dental L-Temp, IvoBase CAD, and Zirkonzahn Temp Basic Tissue. Two materials used for conventionally manufactured dentures were also included as controls (Palapress and Paladon 65). Each material type was sectioned into bars for flexural strength, nanohardness, elastic modulus, and surface microhardness evaluation (n=8/material). Half of the specimens were stored in water for 30 days, while the other half was dry-stored. A 2-way ANOVA was conducted to detect the effect of material and storage on the evaluated properties (α=.05). Linear contrasts were conducted to compare the differences among the 3 types of CAD-CAM material and the conventional ones.

Results

Material type and storage had a significant influence on the flexural strength, nanohardness, elastic modulus, and surface hardness of the materials investigated (P<.001). The post hoc Scheffé test for flexural strength revealed a nonsignificant difference in the interaction between Degos L-Temp and Paladon (P=1.000). In terms of nanohardness, no difference was found when comparing Palapress with Paladon, as well as IvoBase CAD with Zirkonzahn Temp Basic (P=1.000). A nonsignificant interaction in terms of surface hardness was also found between IvoBase CAD and Palapress (P=.575).

Conclusions

The tested materials showed variation in their mechanical properties, with satisfactory behavior of the CAD-CAM materials. However, the results obtained when testing the materials used for the conventional fabrication of complete dentures suggest that their use might still be advisable.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 16:31