G2 Pro gradu, diplomityö, YAMK-opinnäytetyö

IMAGE DERIVED INPUT FUNCTION FOR BRAIN [11C] TMSX PET IMAGING




TekijätImran Waggan

KustantajaUniversity of Turku

KustannuspaikkaTurku PET Center

Julkaisuvuosi2019

Sivujen määrä65

Verkko-osoitehttp://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2019051015083


Tiivistelmä

Modeling and analysis of positron emission tomography (PET) Imaging data requires critical information on the input function of the radioligand used. In PET imaging of the brain, the 'gold standard' for acquiring the input function is to estimate the metabolite's corrected arterial plasma input from the used radioligand as a function of time via arterial cannulation, ie to use the so-called original arterial input function ( OAIF) method. Arterial cannulation, however, is unpleasant for the patient, invasive, requires expertise and additional resources. Patients, it discourages patients and healthy subjects to enroll into clinical PET studies. To counter these problems, the feasibility of an alternative method for acquiring an input function from a PET image, an image-derived input function (IDIF), was evaluated for brain PET Imaging with [11C] TMSX radioligand in this thesis. [11C] TMSX is a radioligand binding selectively to the adenosine A2A receptor. The method was implemented on data from 45 study subjects (9 healthy controls, 19 Parkinson's disease patients and 17 multiple sclerosis patients) imaged with a [11C] TMSX and High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) PET scanner in earlier studies at the Turku PET Center. The results showed significant differences between the IDIF and OAIF values, although with a high correlation. Image derived input function acquisition method that was used in this study is therefore not reliable enough to replace the original arterial input function. Alternative IDIF extraction methods should be investigated for this purpose in the future. [11C] TMSX is a radioligand binding selectively to the adenosine A2A receptor. The method was implemented on data from 45 study subjects (9 healthy controls, 19 Parkinson's disease patients and 17 multiple sclerosis patients) imaged with a [11C] TMSX and High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) PET scanner in earlier studies at the Turku PET Center. The results showed significant differences between the IDIF and OAIF values, although with a high correlation. Image derived input function acquisition method that was used in this study is therefore not reliable enough to replace the original arterial input function. Alternative IDIF extraction methods should be investigated for this purpose in the future. [11C] TMSX is a radioligand binding selectively to the adenosine A2A receptor. The method was implemented on data from 45 study subjects (9 healthy controls, 19 Parkinson's disease patients and 17 multiple sclerosis patients) imaged with a [11C] TMSX and High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) PET scanner in earlier studies at the Turku PET Center. The results showed significant differences between the IDIF and OAIF values, although with a high correlation. Image derived input function acquisition method that was used in this study is therefore not reliable enough to replace the original arterial input function. Alternative IDIF extraction methods should be investigated for this purpose in the future. 19 Parkinson's disease patients and 17 multiple sclerosis patients) imaged with a [11C] TMSX and High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) PET scanner in earlier studies at the Turku PET Center. The results showed significant differences between the IDIF and OAIF values, although with a high correlation. Image derived input function acquisition method that was used in this study is therefore not reliable enough to replace the original arterial input function. Alternative IDIF extraction methods should be investigated for this purpose in the future. 19 Parkinson's disease patients and 17 multiple sclerosis patients) imaged with a [11C] TMSX and High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) PET scanner in earlier studies at the Turku PET Center. The results showed significant differences between the IDIF and OAIF values, although with a high correlation. Image derived input function acquisition method that was used in this study is therefore not reliable enough to replace the original arterial input function. Alternative IDIF extraction methods should be investigated for this purpose in the future. Image derived input function acquisition method that was used in this study is therefore not reliable enough to replace the original arterial input function. Alternative IDIF extraction methods should be investigated for this purpose in the future. Image derived input function acquisition method that was used in this study is therefore not reliable enough to replace the original arterial input function. Alternative IDIF extraction methods should be investigated for this purpose in the future.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 16:45