A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Comparison of Physically Based and Empirical Modeling of Nighttime Spatial Temperature Variability during a Heatwave in and around a City
Tekijät: Saranko, Olli; Suomi, Juuso; Partanen, Antti-Ilari; Fortelius, Carl; Gonzales-Inca, Carlos; Käyhkö, Jukka
Kustantaja: American Meteorological Society
Julkaisuvuosi: 2024
Journal: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Vuosikerta: 63
Numero: 10
Aloitussivu: 1053
Lopetussivu: 1074
ISSN: 1558-8424
eISSN: 1558-8432
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-23-0149.1
Verkko-osoite: http://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-23-0149.1
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/458653512
The numerical weather prediction model HARMONIE-AROME and a multiple linear regression model (referred to in this article as the TURCLIM model after the local climate observation network) were used to model surface air temperature for 25–31 July 2018 in the City of Turku, Finland, to study their performance in urban areas and surrounding rural areas. The 0200 LT (local standard time) temperatures modeled by the HARMONIE-AROME and TURCLIM models were compared to each other and against the observed temperatures to find the model best suited for modeling the urban heat island effect and other spatial temperature variabilities during heatwaves. Observed temperatures were collected from 74 sites, representing both rural and urban environments. Both models were able to reproduce the spatial nighttime temperature variation. However, HARMONIE-AROME modeled temperatures were systematically warmer than the observed temperatures in stable conditions. Spatial differences between the models were mostly related to the physiographic characteristics: for the urban areas, HARMONIE-AROME modeled on average 1.4°C higher temperatures than the TURCLIM model, while for other land-cover types, the average difference was 0.51°C at maximum. The TURCLIM model performed well when the explanatory variables were able to incorporate enough information on the surrounding physiography. Respectively, systematic cold or warm bias occurred in the areas in which the thermophysically relevant physiography was lacking or was only partly captured by the model.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
Research funded by Academy of Finland (329235) | Academy of Finland (329241)