A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Pilot study on neonicotinoids in Finnish waterbirds: no detectable concentrations in common goldeneye (Bucephala clangula) plasma




TekijätAsk, Amalie V.; Gómez-Ramírez, Pilar; Jaspers, Veerle L. B.; Fenoll, José; Cava, Juana; Vakili, Farshad S.; Lemesle, Prescillia; Eeva, Tapio; Davranche, Aurélie; Koivisto, Sanna; Hansen, Martin; Arzel, Céline

KustantajaSpringer Science and Business Media LLC

Julkaisuvuosi2024

JournalEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research

ISSN0944-1344

eISSN1614-7499

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35197-3

Verkko-osoitehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35197-3

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/458361281


Tiivistelmä

Neonicotinoids have been detected in farmland-associated birds and exposure to these insecticides has been linked to adverse effects. Even though neonicotinoids are mobile and persistent and have been detected in surface waters and aquatic invertebrates, there is a considerable lack of knowledge on their occurrence in waterbirds. Here we investigated the occurrence of seven neonicotinoids and some of their transformation products (imidacloprid, thiacloprid, thiamethoxam, acetamiprid, clothianidin, dinotefuran, nitenpyram, 6-chloronicotinic acid, hydroxy-imidacloprid, imidacloprid-urea, imidacloprid-olefin, thiamethoxam-urea, thiacloprid-amide, acetamiprid-acetate, and acetamiprid-desmethyl) in blood plasma of 51 incubating female common goldeneyes (Bucephala clangula). We collected samples from five different regions from southern to northern Finland encompassing rural and urban settings in coastal and inland areas. Surprisingly, none of the targeted neonicotinoids was found above the limit of detection in any of the samples. As neonicotinoid concentrations in wild birds can be very low, a likely reason for the nil results is that the LODs were too high; this and other possible reasons for the lack of detection of neonicotinoids in the goldeneyes are discussed. Our results suggest that neonicotinoid exposure in their breeding areas is currently not of major concern to female goldeneyes in Finland. Even though this study did not find any immediate danger of neonicotinoids to goldeneyes, further studies including surface water, aquatic invertebrates, and other bird species could elucidate potential indirect food chain effects.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
Open Access funding provided by University of Turku (including Turku University Central Hospital). We thank the Waterbird Society for the Waterbird Society Research Award to A. Ask, the Turku University Foundation for a travel grant to A. Ask, the Research Council of Finland for funding (grant nos. 336261 and 333400 to C. Arzel, and SA338180 to T. Eeva), and the European Union – NextGenerationEU for funding P. Gómez-Ramírez.


Last updated on 2025-27-01 at 19:54